Literature DB >> 10922313

Clinical performance of a new high-flux synthetic membrane.

N A Hoenich1, S Stamp.   

Abstract

The clinical performance during first use of a new membrane manufactured from a blend of polyarylethersulfone and polyvinylpyrrolidone (Arylane; Hospal Renal Care, Lyon, France), in which the microstructure of the membrane has been tailored by the manufacturing process and polymer blend, has been compared with Fresenius Polysulfone (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) in a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Small-molecular clearances were similar. A reduction in plasma beta(2)-microglobulin levels was present using both membranes, with a significantly greater removal by Arylane such that the mean postdialysis plasma level difference between the membranes at the end of dialysis was 8. 7 mg/L (95% confidence interval, 3.9 to 13.5; P = 0.004). Recovery of beta(2)-microglobulin from the dialysis fluid was similar: 170 +/- 70 mg for Arylane and 110 +/- 60 mg for Fresenius Polysulfone (P = 0.04). Both membranes were impermeable to albumin but allowed the passage of low-molecular-weight proteins, with 10,046 +/- 3,239 mg for Arylane and 7,285 +/- 2,353 mg for Fresenius Polysulfone recovered from the dialysis fluid (P = 0.07). Neutropenia and platelet adhesion to the membrane were minimal, and time-averaged complement levels during dialysis for C3a and C5b-9 were 207 +/- 92 and 62 +/- 24 ng/mL for Arylane and 223 +/- 68 and 45 +/- 24 ng/mL for Fresenius Polysulfone, respectively, and were membrane independent. This study indicates that the membrane using polyarylethersulfone in conjunction with PVP has complement-activation potential and neutropenia similar to Fresenius Polysulfone but has an enhanced capacity to remove beta(2)-microglobulin. This enhanced removal arises from transmembrane transport augmented by adsorption within the membrane matrix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10922313     DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.8985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

2.  Acute effects of hemodialysis on lung function in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Susanne M Lang; Anja Becker; Rainald Fischer; Rudolf M Huber; Helmut Schiffl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  A M Macleod; M Campbell; J D Cody; C Daly; C Donaldson; A Grant; I Khan; K S Rabindranath; L Vale; S Wallace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

4.  Flux and Passage Enhancement in Hemodialysis by Incorporating Compound Additive into PVDF Polymer Matrix.

Authors:  Qinglei Zhang; Xiaolong Lu; Qingzhao Zhang; Lei Zhang; Suoding Li; Shaobin Liu
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-19

5.  A Bifunctional Adsorber Particle for the Removal of Hydrophobic Uremic Toxins from Whole Blood of Renal Failure Patients.

Authors:  Marieke Sternkopf; Sven Thoröe-Boveleth; Tobias Beck; Kirsten Oleschko; Ansgar Erlenkötter; Ulrich Tschulena; Sonja Steppan; Thimoteus Speer; Claudia Goettsch; Vera Jankowski; Joachim Jankowski; Heidi Noels
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Clinical Safety of Expanded Hemodialysis Compared with Hemodialysis Using High-Flux Dialyzer during a Three-Year Cohort.

Authors:  Nam-Jun Cho; Seung-Hyun Jeong; Ka Young Lee; Jin Young Yu; Samel Park; Eun Young Lee; Hyo-Wook Gil
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.