Literature DB >> 10922156

Evaluation of skeletal stability following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.

A F Ayoub1, D T Millett, S Hasan.   

Abstract

This retrospective study was designed to assess skeletal stability after the correction of mandibular prognathism by sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) and intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy (VSO). We used lateral cephalographs of 31 patients taken before, immediately after, and at least one year after the operation. We recorded euclidean distance matrix analysis, linear and angular measurements, and x and y co-ordinates of cephalometric landmarks for each cephalograph. There were no significant differences in extent of the mandibular retrognathia or magnitude of change between the two groups. The main significant changes in both groups were reduction of the total mandibular length, and posterior shifting in the mandible. One year after the operation the main change was the mean forward relapse of 2.5 mm in the SSO group and the mean posterior relapse of 0.5 mm in the VSO group. The difference in skeletal stability between the groups was significant (P< 0.05), and we conclude that VSO is the more effective technique for correcting mandibular prognathism. Copyright 2000 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10922156     DOI: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  8 in total

1.  Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ra'ed M A Al-Delayme; Moutaz Al-Khen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

2.  Surgical Management of Laterognathia in Orthofacial Surgery.

Authors:  J M García Y Sánchez; C L Gómez Rodríguez; J Romero Flores
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

3.  Three-dimensional regional displacement after surgical-orthodontic correction of Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  L Koerich; A C O Ruellas; B Paniagua; M Styner; T Turvey; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Evaluation of relapse after orthodontic therapy combined with orthognathic surgery in the treatment of skeletal class III.

Authors:  Inken Friederike de Haan; Robert Ciesielski; Tobias Nitsche; Bernd Koos
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Long-term stability of surgical-orthodontic correction of class III malocclusions with long-face syndrome.

Authors:  David Gallego-Romero; José-María Llamas-Carrera; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Vanessa Paredes; Eduardo Espinar; Eduardo Guevara; José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

6.  A Case of Extreme Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Beyond the Envelope of Discrepancy, Managed Effectively by a Modified Ortho-Surgical Protocol.

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj; Pankaj Juneja
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-03-27

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth.

Authors:  Hideko Minami-Sugaya; Débora A Lentini-Oliveira; Fernando R Carvalho; Marco Antonio C Machado; Clóvis Marzola; Humberto Saconato; Gilmar F Prado
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 8.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.