Literature DB >> 10920837

Pain intensity and pain interference in hospitalized patients with cancer.

N Wells1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To examine relationships among pain intensity, interference in daily life because of pain, reported pain relief, and analgesics prescribed in hospitalized patients with cancer.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive.
SETTING: The internal medicine services of two acute-care facilities, an academic medical center, and a community hospital in the northeastern United States. SAMPLE: 176 patients with cancer, 139 of whom reported pain during hospitalization. Mean age of the sample was 59 years, 50% were women, and 79% were Caucasian.
METHODS: Patients were interviewed in their hospital rooms to obtain information about the major variables using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form and the Pain Management Index. Demographic, clinical, and analgesic prescription data were obtained from patients' medical records. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Pain intensity, pain-related interference, and pain relief analgesic adequacy.
FINDINGS: The prevalence of pain in the sample of 176 patients was 79%. Of the 139 patients who experienced pain during hospitalization, a strong positive correlation was found between worst pain intensity and interference, which was not appreciably altered by surgery or procedures conducted during hospitalization. Although patients with metastatic disease reported greater pain intensity and interference than patients without metastases, they were more likely to have adequate analgesics prescribed.
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that pain interferes with daily life and that higher levels of pain produce greater interference. Adequate analgesics were prescribed for a majority of the patients, yet levels of worst pain remained severe for 46% of the sample. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: These findings reinforce the need to assess and treat pain in hospitalized patients with cancer. Nurses need to be aware of the prescribed dose of analgesics and administer a dose that provides adequate pain relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10920837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  10 in total

1.  A randomized trial of a representational intervention to decrease cancer pain (RIDcancerPain).

Authors:  Sandra Ward; Heidi Donovan; Sigridur Gunnarsdottir; Ronald C Serlin; Gary R Shapiro; Susan Hughes
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Pain as a predictor of heavy drinking and any drinking lapses in the COMBINE study and the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Kevin E Vowles; Elizabeth McCallion; Tessa Frohe; Megan Kirouac; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Pain Intensity Moderates the Relationship Between Age and Pain Interference in Chronic Orofacial Pain Patients.

Authors:  Ian A Boggero; Paul J Geiger; Suzanne C Segerstrom; Charles R Carlson
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Individual difference variables and the effects of progressive muscle relaxation and analgesic imagery interventions on cancer pain.

Authors:  Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Britt Wanta; Molly Bumpus
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 5.  Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature.

Authors:  S Deandrea; M Montanari; L Moja; G Apolone
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation interventions used for cancer pain.

Authors:  Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Hannah Hau; Britt Wanta; Molly Bumpus
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.446

7.  A theory-based educational intervention targeting nurses' attitudes and knowledge concerning cancer-related pain management: a study protocol of a quasi-experimental design.

Authors:  Gunilla Borglin; Markus Gustafsson; Hans Krona
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Can a theory-based educational intervention change nurses' knowledge and attitudes concerning cancer pain management? A quasi-experimental design.

Authors:  Markus Gustafsson; Gunilla Borglin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Hospitalized patients' pain experience before and after the introduction of a nurse-based pain management programme: a separate sample pre and post study.

Authors:  Gugsa Nemera Germossa; Ragnhild Hellesø; Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 10.  Efficacy of Compound Kushen Injection in Relieving Cancer-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Ming Guo; Yi-Xue Huang; Hong-Hui Shen; Xiu-Xiu Sang; Xiao Ma; Yan-Ling Zhao; Xiao-He Xiao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.