OBJECTIVE: Premenopausal women are protected against atherosclerosis by high plasma estrogen levels, which have been suggested to augment endothelial nitric oxide synthesis and to improve endothelial function. In contrast, premenopausal use of oral contraceptives is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. We investigated the influence of oral contraception on endothelial function. STUDY DESIGN: Sixteen healthy premenopausal women with a mean age (+/-SD) of 27 +/- 3 years, 8 of whom used oral contraceptives and 8 of whom did not, were examined in a case-control study. Forearm plethysmography was used to measure changes of forearm blood flow in response to intra-arterial infusion of increasing doses of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine. RESULTS: Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (change from baseline after acetylcholine 48 microg/min) was similar between women with (828% +/- 137%) and without oral contraception (701% +/- 114%; P not significant), as was endothelium-independent vasodilatation (change from baseline after sodium nitroprusside 3200 ng/min, 271% +/- 38% vs 289% +/- 23%; P not significant). In contrast, inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine induced a significantly more marked decrease in blood flow among women with oral contraception than among those without at all dosages (change from baseline after 4-micromol/min N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine, -26% +/- 3% vs -14% +/- 5%; P =.009 by analysis of variance). CONCLUSION: Stimulated nitric oxide bioavailability remained unaffected in a group of premenopausal women receiving oral contraceptives. In contrast, basal nitric oxide production and release appeared to be enhanced by oral contraceptive use.
OBJECTIVE: Premenopausal women are protected against atherosclerosis by high plasma estrogen levels, which have been suggested to augment endothelial nitric oxide synthesis and to improve endothelial function. In contrast, premenopausal use of oral contraceptives is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. We investigated the influence of oral contraception on endothelial function. STUDY DESIGN: Sixteen healthy premenopausal women with a mean age (+/-SD) of 27 +/- 3 years, 8 of whom used oral contraceptives and 8 of whom did not, were examined in a case-control study. Forearm plethysmography was used to measure changes of forearm blood flow in response to intra-arterial infusion of increasing doses of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine. RESULTS: Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (change from baseline after acetylcholine 48 microg/min) was similar between women with (828% +/- 137%) and without oral contraception (701% +/- 114%; P not significant), as was endothelium-independent vasodilatation (change from baseline after sodium nitroprusside 3200 ng/min, 271% +/- 38% vs 289% +/- 23%; P not significant). In contrast, inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine induced a significantly more marked decrease in blood flow among women with oral contraception than among those without at all dosages (change from baseline after 4-micromol/min N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine, -26% +/- 3% vs -14% +/- 5%; P =.009 by analysis of variance). CONCLUSION: Stimulated nitric oxide bioavailability remained unaffected in a group of premenopausal women receiving oral contraceptives. In contrast, basal nitric oxide production and release appeared to be enhanced by oral contraceptive use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Arteriosclerosis; Atherosclerosis--women; Biology; Cardiovascular Effects--women; Case Control Studies; Clinical Research; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Developed Countries; Diseases; Endocrine System; Estrogens; Europe; Family Planning; Germany; Hormones; Oral Contraceptives; Physiology; Research Methodology; Research Report; Studies; Vascular Diseases; Western Europe; Women
Authors: Dain W Jacob; Aaron M Voshage; Jennifer L Harper; Jacqueline K Limberg Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 5.125
Authors: Jessica R Meendering; Britta N Torgrimson; Nicole P Miller; Paul F Kaplan; Christopher T Minson Journal: Contraception Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Mary E J Lott; Cindy Hogeman; Michael Herr; Monica Bhagat; Lawrence I Sinoway Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Rafael Amorim Belo Nunes; Lucia Pereira Barroso; Alexandre da Costa Pereira; Maria Urbana Pinto Brandão Rondon; Carlos Eduardo Negrão; José Eduardo Krieger; Alfredo José Mansur Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2016-10-13
Authors: Dain W Jacob; Jennifer L Harper; Clayton L Ivie; Elizabeth P Ott; Jacqueline K Limberg Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 2.858
Authors: Jacqueline K Limberg; Garrett L Peltonen; Rebecca E Johansson; John W Harrell; Jeremy M Kellawan; Marlowe W Eldridge; Joshua J Sebranek; Benjamin J Walker; William G Schrage Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 4.566