Literature DB >> 10920152

High-versus low-threshold surfactant retreatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

J Kattwinkel1, B T Bloom, P Delmore, C Glick, D Brown, S Lopez, L Willett, E A Egan, M Conaway, J Patrie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Surfactant therapy has become an effective standard therapy for infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The first dose may be given either as prophylaxis immediately after delivery, or as rescue after an infant has developed RDS. Second and subsequent doses are currently recommended by the manufacturers to be administered at minimal levels of respiratory support.
PURPOSE: This study compared the relative efficacy of administering second and subsequent doses of Infasurf surfactant at a low threshold (FIO(2) >30%, still requiring endotracheal intubation) versus a high threshold (FIO(2) >40%, mean airway pressure >7 cm H(2)O) of respiratory support.
METHODS: A total of 2484 neonates received a first dose of surfactant; 1267 reached conventional retreatment criteria and were randomized to be retreated according to low- or high-threshold criteria. They were then retreated at a minimum of 6-hour intervals each time they reached their assigned threshold until receiving a maximum of 4 total doses. Subjects were stratified by whether they received their first dose by prophylaxis or rescue and by whether their lung disease was considered complicated (evidence of perinatal compromise or sepsis) or uncomplicated.
RESULTS: Among the patients randomized, 33% of prophylaxis and 23% of rescue subjects met criteria for the complicated stratum. Although infants allocated to the high-threshold strategy were receiving slightly more oxygen at 72 hours, there was no difference in the number receiving mechanical ventilation at 72 hours or in the secondary respiratory outcomes (requirement for supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation at 28 days, supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postconceptional age, inspired oxygen concentration >60% at any time). However, there was a significantly higher mortality for infants with complicated RDS who had received retreatment according to the high-threshold strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that equal efficacy can be realized by delaying surfactant retreatment of infants with uncomplicated RDS until they have reached a higher level of respiratory support than is the current standard. We speculate that this would result in a substantial cost-saving from less utilization of drug. Conversely, we believe that infants with complicated RDS should continue to be treated by the low-threshold retreatment strategy, which is currently recommended by the manufacturers of the commercially available surfactants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10920152     DOI: 10.1542/peds.106.2.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Recommendations for neonatal surfactant therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Felicia L Bahadue; Roger Soll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

4.  Pharmacokinetics and clinical predictors of surfactant redosing in respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Paola E Cogo; Maddalena Facco; Manuela Simonato; Daniele De Luca; Francesca De Terlizi; Umberto Rizzotti; Giovanna Verlato; Maria Paola Bellagamba; Virgilio P Carnielli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Guidelines for surfactant replacement therapy in neonates.

Authors:  Eugene H Ng; Vibhuti Shah
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Oscillatory mechanics at birth for identifying infants requiring surfactant: a prospective, observational trial.

Authors:  Anna Lavizzari; Chiara Veneroni; Francesco Beretta; Valeria Ottaviani; Claudia Fumagalli; Marta Tossici; Mariarosa Colnaghi; Fabio Mosca; Raffaele L Dellacà
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  RETREATMENT WITH SURFACTANT IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT PRETERM INFANTS: RISK PREDICTORS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON NEONATAL OUTCOMES.

Authors:  Walusa Assad Gonçalves Ferri; Adriana Carnevale da Silva; Eliana Motta Fernandes Sacramento; Cristina Calixto; Davi Casale Aragon; Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2020-11-16

8.  Characteristics and outcomes of preterm neonates according to number of doses of surfactant received.

Authors:  Hanita Coshal; Amit Mukerji; Brigitte Lemyre; Eugene H Ng; Ruben Alvaro; Guillaume Ethier; Eugene W Yoon; Marc Beltempo; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.521

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.