M R Miller1, C B Forrest, J S Kan. 1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. mmiller@ahcpr.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined parental preferences for locus of service delivery for their teenager's congenital heart disease (CHD) and the influence of disease severity, sociodemographic factors, and insurance on these preferences. METHODS: A consecutive sample of parents of teenagers followed in a pediatric cardiology clinic completed a mailed questionnaire. Disease severity was classified as low (</=1 cardiovascular procedure), moderate (>1 cardiovascular procedure), and high (cyanosis or single ventricle physiology). RESULTS: Eighty-six of 148 parents responded (58%): 40, low severity; 36, moderate severity; and 10, high severity of illness. Parents preferred using primary care providers (PCPs) as a point of first contact for all 11 of 11 general health concerns and 5 of 7 potential cardiovascular-related concerns: chest pain (52%), syncope (73%), seeming seriously ill (79%), sports physical examination (79%), and endocarditis prophylactic antibiotics (94%). Increasing disease severity was significantly associated with preferring cardiologists for 6 of 7 cardiovascular-related concerns. Overall, 58% of parents viewed their care as a PCP-cardiologist comanagement model versus a cardiologist-dominated model. Lower family income (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5; confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.2) and severity of illness (OR: 2.1; CI: 1.0-4.4) were associated with a comanagement model of health care versus a cardiologist-dominated model. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the majority of parents of teenagers with CHD prefer to use their teenager's PCP for all routine health care needs and many cardiovascular health needs. Severity of illness and family income are positively associated with greater preference for cardiologist care.
OBJECTIVES: We examined parental preferences for locus of service delivery for their teenager's congenital heart disease (CHD) and the influence of disease severity, sociodemographic factors, and insurance on these preferences. METHODS: A consecutive sample of parents of teenagers followed in a pediatric cardiology clinic completed a mailed questionnaire. Disease severity was classified as low (</=1 cardiovascular procedure), moderate (>1 cardiovascular procedure), and high (cyanosis or single ventricle physiology). RESULTS: Eighty-six of 148 parents responded (58%): 40, low severity; 36, moderate severity; and 10, high severity of illness. Parents preferred using primary care providers (PCPs) as a point of first contact for all 11 of 11 general health concerns and 5 of 7 potential cardiovascular-related concerns: chest pain (52%), syncope (73%), seeming seriously ill (79%), sports physical examination (79%), and endocarditis prophylactic antibiotics (94%). Increasing disease severity was significantly associated with preferring cardiologists for 6 of 7 cardiovascular-related concerns. Overall, 58% of parents viewed their care as a PCP-cardiologist comanagement model versus a cardiologist-dominated model. Lower family income (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5; confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.2) and severity of illness (OR: 2.1; CI: 1.0-4.4) were associated with a comanagement model of health care versus a cardiologist-dominated model. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the majority of parents of teenagers with CHD prefer to use their teenager's PCP for all routine health care needs and many cardiovascular health needs. Severity of illness and family income are positively associated with greater preference for cardiologist care.
Authors: Sarah K Luthy; Sunkyung Yu; Janet E Donohue; Emefah Loccoh; Caren S Goldberg; Jimmy C Lu Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Ju Ryoung Moon; Jinyoung Song; June Huh; I-Seok Kang; Seung Woo Park; Sung-A Chang; Ji-Hyuk Yang; Tae-Gook Jun Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-09-08
Authors: Fouke Ombelet; Eva Goossens; Alexander Van De Bruaene; Werner Budts; Philip Moons Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.501