Literature DB >> 10920063

Application of the New York State PTCA mortality model in patients undergoing stent implantation.

D R Holmes1, P B Berger, K N Garratt, V Mathew, M R Bell, G W Barsness, S T Higano, D E Grill, L N Hammes, C S Rihal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study applied the New York State conventional coronary angioplasty (PTCA) model of clinical outcomes to evaluate whether it has relevance in the current era of stent implantation. The model was developed in 62 670 patients treated with conventional PTCA from 1991 to 1994 to risk adjust mortality and bypass surgery after PTCA. Since then, stents have become the dominant form of intervention. Whether that model remains relevant is uncertain. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All patients undergoing stenting at the Mayo Clinic from 1995 to 1998 were analyzed for in-hospital mortality, bypass surgery performed after attempted stenting, and longer-term mortality. No patients were excluded. The New York model was used to risk adjust and predict in-hospital and follow-up mortality. There were 3761 patients with 4063 procedural admissions for stenting; 6,472 target vessel segments were attempted, and 96.1% of procedures were successful. With the New York multivariable risk factor equation, 79 in-hospital deaths were expected (1.95%); 66 deaths (1.62%) were observed. The New York model risk score in a logistic regression model was the most significant factor associated with in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.86; P<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 1.2+/-1.0 years, there were 154 deaths. Multivariable analysis documented 6 factors associated with subsequent mortality; New York risk score was the most significant (chi(2)=16.64, P=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the New York mortality model was developed in an era of conventional angioplasty, it remains relevant in patients undergoing stenting. The risk score derived from that model is the variable most significantly associated with not only in-hospital but also longer-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10920063     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.5.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  5 in total

1.  Multivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England.

Authors:  A D Grayson; R K Moore; M Jackson; S Rathore; S Sastry; T P Gray; I Schofield; A Chauhan; F F Ordoubadi; B Prendergast; R H Stables
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Comorbid conditions and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  M Singh; C S Rihal; V L Roger; R J Lennon; J Spertus; A Jahangir; D R Holmes
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Tree-structured risk stratification of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a report from the New York State percutaneous coronary intervention database.

Authors:  Abdissa Negassa; E Scott Monrad; Ji Yon Bang; Vankeepuram S Srinivas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Prediction of length of stay following elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Abdissa Negassa; E Scott Monrad
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2011-07-18

5.  A nomogram predicting 30-day mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jingjing Song; Yupeng Liu; Wenyao Wang; Jing Chen; Jie Yang; Jun Wen; Jun Gao; Chunli Shao; Yi-Da Tang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.