Literature DB >> 10919119

[Regression analysis of corneal endothelium after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty].

A Langenbucher1, N X Nguyen, M M Kus, K Blüthner, M Küchle, B Seitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The corneal endothelial cell density is a crucial parameter for the pump function and the transparency of grafts after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). The purpose of this study was to assess corneal endothelial cell density with different regression models after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty and to check for differences between diagnoses and two different storage methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-six eyes (195 keratoconus, 101 Fuchs' dystrophies, 148 each with short-term preserved and organ-cultured donor corneas) of 268 patients were included in this prospective study. Donor and recipient trephination was performed using nonmechanical trephination technique with the excimer laser 193 nm along metal aperture masks from the epithelial side. The time course of the endothelial cell density (specular microscope EM 1100, TOMEY, Erlangen) after PK was assessed. Endothelial cell density was first analyzed in a cross sectional manner at the 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow-up and, secondly in a longitudinal manner with linear, polynomial and exponential regression models in the sense of minimizing the residuum (distance between observed and predicted endothelial cell count). The mean donor postmortem time was 10.3 +/- 6.8 hours for short-term-preserved and 19.6 +/- 9.5 hours for organ-cultured corneas (p < 0.0001). The storage time was 63 +/- 49 and 19 +/- 7 days (p < 0.0001), respectively.
RESULTS: In a cross section, overall mean endothelial cell density decreased from 2145 +/- 599 cells/mm2 at the 3 months to 1751 +/- 605 cells/mm2 at 2 years follow-up (p > 0.05). Cell density did not differ significantly between different diagnoses or storage methods at any postoperative stage. In a longitudinal section, the linear regression model estimated an annual decrease of 214 cells/mm2. In a polynomial model the decrease expressed by a tangent to the regression line at 24 months was 175 cells/mm2. The exponential regression model yielded a relative decrease of 9.5% annually. The so-called residuum as a measure for the validity of the regression model was maximal in the linear and minimal in the exponential estimate. With keratoconus and short-term preserved donor material the endothelial cell loss was less in the regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: During the first two years after nonmechanical trephination in PK, a non-significant decrease in endothelial cell density was observed. The exponential regression model seems to be predestinated for analysis of the time course of corneal endothelium in a longitudinal manner. The annual cell loss ranged around 9.5% without significant differences between diagnoses and storage methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10919119     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-10586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  8 in total

1.  Endothelial cell loss after autologous rotational keratoplasty.

Authors:  Florian Birnbaum; Thomas Reinhard; Daniel Böhringer; Rainer Sundmacher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Influencing factors on chronic endothelial cell loss characterised in a homogeneous group of patients.

Authors:  Daniel Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Helga Spelsberg; Rainer Sundmacher
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  [Posterior chamber lens implantation after penetrating keratoplasty. Is this partly responsible for late transplantation failure?].

Authors:  D Böhringer; T Reinhard; H Spelsberg; R Sundmacher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Results of the first 1,000 consecutive elective nonmechanical keratoplasties using the excimer laser. A prospective study over more than 12 years].

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher; N X Nguyen; M M Kus; M Küchle; G O H Naumann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Predictive donor factors for chronic endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty in a regression model.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Nhung X Nguyen; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Assessment of endothelial cell density and corneal thickness in corneal grafts an average of 5 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Beata Kettesy; Gabor Nemeth; Adam Kemeny-Beke; Andras Berta; Laszlo Modis
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Mayank A Nanavaty; Xue Wang; Alex J Shortt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-14

8.  Quantitative & qualitative analysis of endothelial cells of donor cornea before & after penetrating keratoplasty in different pathological conditions.

Authors:  Aruna K R Gupta; Roopam K R Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.375

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.