Literature DB >> 10919012

Laparoscopic colectomy: indications, standardized technique and results after 6 years experience.

E Croce1, S Olmi, M Azzola, R Russo, M Di Bonifacio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present study was to perform a retrospective study of our experience in performing laparoscopic colon surgery after 6 years experience.
METHODOLOGY: From April 1992 to April 1998, 215 patients underwent colon laparoscopic surgery. There were 121 females and 94 males, whose average age was 66.7 (range: 31-92).
RESULTS: 170 laparoscopic procedures were completed out of 215 (79%): 151 resections (22 for a benign lesion and 129 for a malignant one), 4 reversal of Hartmann's procedures, 6 rectopexy, 3 ileotransverstomies and 6 suture of traumatic colon perforation. There were 3 mortalities out of 215 (1.9%). The conversions were 45 out of 215 (20.9%); 22 (10.2%) cases were, however, converted to a laparoscopic facilitated procedure. The most common causes for conversion were the presence of bulky tumors and/or tumors that contaminated the adjacent structures (16/215), adhesions due to previous operations (9/215) and the patient's obesity (8/215). There were 39 complications (18.1%), 10 (4.6%) out of which required reoperation (2 anastomotic fistula, 2 anastomotic leak, 2 anastomotic stenosis, 2 hemorrhage, 1 colic iatrogenic perforation and 1 occlusion to rotation of anastomosis). There were only 2 recurrences (1.3%), 15 months (C2) and 8 months (B2) after the operation for intraoperative technical error. The average number of lymph nodes harvested in resected specimens was 12.8 (range: 1-41), whereas the mean distance of the tumor from the proximal margin of resection was 11.5 cm (range: 5-35), and from the distal margin 7.5 cm (range: 1-25). The average operative time was 165 min (range: 40-360), and the mean hospital stay was 9.2 days (range: 6-40).
CONCLUSIONS: A colon resection for a malignant lesion, if performed with the highest respect for the oncologic principles, proves that it is impossible to develop a wall and intraluminal recurrence, which, in our opinion, may be caused by an improper surgical technique. Therefore, neoplastic colon laparoscopic surgery must be the perogative of a few selected and specialized centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10919012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Enrico Di Salvo; Paolo Delrio; Luigi Bucci; Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano; Carmine Napolitano; Maria Rachele Angiolini; Umberto Bracale; Marco Clemente; Michele D'ambra; Gaetano Luglio; Mario Musella; Ugo Pace; Riccardo Rosati; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with previous abdominal surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marleny Novaes Figueiredo; Fabio Guilherme Campos; Luiz Augusto D'Albuquerque; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Ivan Cecconello; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-27

3.  Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival?

Authors:  H Moloo; J Mamazza; E C Poulin; S E Burpee; Y Bendavid; L Klein; R Gregoire; C M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic right radical hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Sadhana V Deo; Shailesh P Puntambekar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Construction of a preoperative scoring system to predict the difficulty level of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Satohiro Matsumoto; Takeshi Uehara; Hirosato Mashima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.