Literature DB >> 10918402

Foscarnet prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infections in patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT): a dose-finding study.

S Bregante1, S Bertilson, E Tedone, M T Van Lint, G Trespi, N Mordini, G Berisso, F Gualandi, T Lamparelli, O Figari, F Benvenuto, A M Raiola, A Bacigalupo.   

Abstract

This is a dose-finding study using foscarnet for CMV prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in 20 high risk patients (unrelated donors, or T cell depleted, and/or advanced disease). Foscarnet was started on day +1 after BMT and continued until day +100. We explored four different dose levels, patients being entered at the lowest dose level until one patient experiences CMV-reactivation, identified as two consecutive positive CMV antigenemias (CMVAg-emia). The four dose levels expressed as mg/kg/day between days 1 and 30 (induction) and between days 31 and 100 (maintenance) were respectively: dose level I = 60/30 (n = 5); dose level II = 120/60 (n = 4); dose level III = 120/90 (n = 5) and dose level IV = 120/120 (n = 6). All patients showed engraftment: PMN > or =0.5 x 109/l at a median interval of 16, 21, 17, 15 days after BMT, and Plt > or =30x10(9)/l on days 19, 16, 17, 17 respectively. CMVAg-emia was seen in 10 patients at a median interval of 53 days post-BMT (range 33-89) with a median of 10 CMV antigen+ cells (range 1-16). There was a dose effect of foscarnet on CMVAg-emia: respectively 4/5 patients (80%), 2/4 (50%), 3/5 (60%) and 1/6 (18%) at dose levels I, II, III, IV (P = 0.1). CMV disease was seen in 3/9 (33%) at dose levels I, II and 0/11 at dose levels III, IV (P = 0. 07). The median number of CMV antigen-positive cells at diagnosis of CMV infection was different: 13 in dose levels I-II and two in dose levels III-IV (P = 0.01). Increased creatininine was seen in 15 patients with a mean of 1.8 mg% (range 1.5-5.7) and was the cause of discontinuation in nine patients (45%). Renal toxicity was reversible in all nine patients. Overall actuarial TRM at 2 years was 31%: 47% for patients at dose levels I-II and 19% for patients at dose levels III-IV. In conclusion, foscarnet exhibits a dose-dependent prophylactic effect on CMVAg-emia, CMV disease and transplant-related mortality with acceptable and reversible renal toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10918402     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  12 in total

Review 1.  How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Michael Boeckh; Per Ljungman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Clinical and economic burden of pre-emptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection in hospitalized allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Lynn El Haddad; Shashank S Ghantoji; Anne K Park; Marjorie V Batista; Jonathan Schelfhout; Jack Hachem; Yadira Lobo; Ying Jiang; Gabriela Rondon; Richard Champlin; Roy F Chemaly
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  How I treat CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Hermann Einsele; Per Ljungman; Michael Boeckh
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  How I treat resistant cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Firas El Chaer; Dimpy P Shah; Roy F Chemaly
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Use of foscarnet for cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a related donor.

Authors:  Maiko Asakura; Kazuhiro Ikegame; Satoshi Yoshihara; Shuichi Taniguchi; Takehiko Mori; Tetsuya Etoh; Akiyoshi Takami; Takashi Yoshida; Takahiro Fukuda; Kazuo Hatanaka; Heiwa Kanamori; Toshiaki Yujiri; Yoshiko Atsuta; Hisashi Sakamaki; Ritsuro Suzuki; Hiroyasu Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Ellen Meijer; Greet J Boland; Leo F Verdonck
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  The clinical and financial burden of pre-emptive management of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation-implications for preventative treatment approaches.

Authors:  Natasha A Jain; Kit Lu; Sawa Ito; Pawel Muranski; Christopher S Hourigan; Janice Haggerty; Puja D Chokshi; Catalina Ramos; Elena Cho; Lisa Cook; Richard Childs; Minoo Battiwalla; A John Barrett
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.414

8.  Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data.

Authors:  Patrick Derigs; Aleksandar Radujkovic; Maria-Luisa Schubert; Paul Schnitzler; Tilman Schöning; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Ute Hegenbart; Stefan O Schönland; Thomas Luft; Peter Dreger; Michael Schmitt
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.673

9.  Visilizumab with tacrolimus and methotrexate for GvHD prevention after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from mismatched unrelated donors.

Authors:  L E Perez; H Fernandez; E Ayala; F Beato; A Neuger; J Pidala; M J Schell; C Anasetti
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Cellular Therapeutic Approaches to Cytomegalovirus Infection Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Manar S Shafat; Vedika Mehra; Karl S Peggs; Claire Roddie
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.