M Poullis1, R Manning, M Laffan, D O Haskard, K M Taylor, R C Landis. 1. BHF Units of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiovascular Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, and the Department of Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite aprotinin being in widespread clinical use to prevent bleeding during cardiac surgery, there remains concern that such a powerful hemostatic agent may also be prothrombotic, particularly in relation to coronary vein graft occlusion. The major thrombin receptor on platelets, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) requires proteolytic cleavage to transmit activating signals. Here we have investigated the effect of aprotinin on thrombin-induced PAR1 activation of platelets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Proteolysis-dependent and -independent responses of washed platelets were studied in vitro. Platelet aggregation induced by trypsin was dependent on PAR1 (inhibited by the PAR1-specific antagonist peptide, FLLRN) and was completely blocked by aprotinin at doses more than 100 KIU/mL. Aggregation in response to thrombin, 1 nmol/L, was predominantly mediated through PAR1 and was inhibited 42.6% to 86.6% (P <.05-.001) by pharmacologic doses of aprotinin (50-160 KIU/mL). Aprotinin did not inhibit the nonproteolytic agonists collagen, epinephrine, adenosine diphosphate, or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Furthermore, blockade of the thrombin response by aprotinin did not prevent subsequent platelet aggregation through collagen or epinephrine. Experiments with intraplatelet Ca(2+) fluxes, which provided an earlier measure of platelet activation, placed the effect of aprotinin proximal to the PAR1 activation event. Since aprotinin did not inhibit platelet responses to the nonproteolytic PAR1 agonist peptide, SFLLRN, this implied that aprotinin acted by preventing PAR1 receptor cleavage by thrombin. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation by preventing proteolysis of the PAR1 receptor. These findings argue against aprotinin being prothrombotic and suggest instead that aprotinin may have significant antithrombotic effects.
BACKGROUND: Despite aprotinin being in widespread clinical use to prevent bleeding during cardiac surgery, there remains concern that such a powerful hemostatic agent may also be prothrombotic, particularly in relation to coronary vein graft occlusion. The major thrombin receptor on platelets, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) requires proteolytic cleavage to transmit activating signals. Here we have investigated the effect of aprotinin on thrombin-induced PAR1 activation of platelets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Proteolysis-dependent and -independent responses of washed platelets were studied in vitro. Platelet aggregation induced by trypsin was dependent on PAR1 (inhibited by the PAR1-specific antagonist peptide, FLLRN) and was completely blocked by aprotinin at doses more than 100 KIU/mL. Aggregation in response to thrombin, 1 nmol/L, was predominantly mediated through PAR1 and was inhibited 42.6% to 86.6% (P <.05-.001) by pharmacologic doses of aprotinin (50-160 KIU/mL). Aprotinin did not inhibit the nonproteolytic agonists collagen, epinephrine, adenosine diphosphate, or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Furthermore, blockade of the thrombin response by aprotinin did not prevent subsequent platelet aggregation through collagen or epinephrine. Experiments with intraplatelet Ca(2+) fluxes, which provided an earlier measure of platelet activation, placed the effect of aprotinin proximal to the PAR1 activation event. Since aprotinin did not inhibit platelet responses to the nonproteolytic PAR1 agonist peptide, SFLLRN, this implied that aprotinin acted by preventing PAR1 receptor cleavage by thrombin. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation by preventing proteolysis of the PAR1 receptor. These findings argue against aprotinin being prothrombotic and suggest instead that aprotinin may have significant antithrombotic effects.
Authors: Katharine A Fox; Daniela E Kirwan; Ashley M Whittington; Nitya Krishnan; Brian D Robertson; Robert H Gilman; José W López; Shivani Singh; Joanna C Porter; Jon S Friedland Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J R S Day; I S Malik; A Weerasinghe; M Poullis; I Nadra; D O Haskard; K M Taylor; R C Landis Journal: Heart Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Pranjal H Desai; Dinesh Kurian; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Sneha P Desai; Pluen Ziu; Michael Grant; Charles White; R Clive Landis; Robert S Poston Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Peter H Norman; Peter F Thall; Ronaldo V Purugganan; Bernhard J C J Riedel; Dilip R Thakar; David C Rice; Lisa Huynh; Wei Qiao; Sijin Wen; W Roy Smythe Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert S Poston; Junyan Gu; Charles White; Jean Jeudy; Lei Nie; James Brown; James Gammie; Richard N Pierson; Linda Romar; Bartley P Griffith Journal: Transfusion Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.157