Literature DB >> 10917409

Specific sensory detection, discrimination, and hedonic estimation of nicotine enantiomers in smokers and nonsmokers: are there limitations in replacing the sensory components of nicotine?

N Thuerauf1, M Kaegler, B Renner, A Barocka, G Kobal.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate in smokers and nonsmokers (1) the olfactory and trigeminal detection of R(+)- and S(-)-nicotine and (2) the discrimination ability and hedonic estimation of nicotine enantiomers in olfactory and trigeminal concentrations. Thirty healthy male subjects (15 smokers, 15 nonsmokers) participated in the experiments. A randomized sequence of R(+)- and S(-)-nicotine stimuli (seven R(+)- and seven S(-)-nicotine stimuli) were introduced into the right nostril of the subjects using a Kobal-olfactometer. The subjects were instructed to group the stimuli into two categories (A and B). To test the role of the olfactory and the trigeminal system in this discrimination task, the authors studied the olfactory detection threshold for the "odorous" sensation and the trigeminal detection thresholds for the "burning" and "stinging" sensations. Nicotine enantiomers were presented at the individual "olfactory" and "trigeminal" concentration levels. The subjects estimated the hedonic properties using a bipolar visual analog scale (from "very unpleasant" to "very pleasant"). A statistical evaluation (t-test) revealed that the subjects were able to identify R(+)- and S(-)-nicotine at olfactory and trigeminal concentrations (p < or = 0.01, p < or = 0.001, respectively). At concentrations near the detection thresholds, i.e., clearly below subjective pain thresholds, smokers rated both nicotine stereoisomers to be significantly more pleasant than did nonsmokers (t-test, R(+)-nicotine: p < or = 0.05; S(-)-nicotine: p < or = 0.01). Increasing the concentrations to above trigeminal thresholds resulted in a difference in hedonic estimates. Smokers perceived the S(-)-isomer as being less unpleasant than nonsmokers at trigeminal concentrations (t-test, p < or = 0.001). This difference in perception might be explained by the smokers' experience with S(-)-nicotine, which is the natural nicotine enantiomer in tobacco.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10917409     DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200008000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  8 in total

1.  Cellular basis for the olfactory response to nicotine.

Authors:  Bruce Bryant; Jiang Xu; Valery Audige; Fritz W Lischka; Nancy E Rawson
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Nicotine and ethanol co-use in Long-Evans rats: Stimulatory effects of perinatal exposure to a fat-rich diet.

Authors:  Olga Karatayev; Olga Lukatskaya; Sang-Ho Moon; Wei-Ran Guo; Dan Chen; Diane Algava; Susan Abedi; Sarah F Leibowitz
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.405

3.  Memantine fails to facilitate partial cigarette deprivation in smokers--no role of Memantine in the treatment of nicotine dependency?

Authors:  N Thuerauf; J Lunkenheimer; B Lunkenheimer; W Sperling; S Bleich; M Schlabeck; J Wiltfang; J Kornhuber
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Activation of olfactory and trigeminal cortical areas following stimulation of the nasal mucosa with low concentrations of S(-)-nicotine vapor--an fMRI study on chemosensory perception.

Authors:  Jessica Albrecht; Rainer Kopietz; Jennifer Linn; Vehbi Sakar; Andrea Anzinger; Tatjana Schreder; Olga Pollatos; Hartmut Brückmann; Gerd Kobal; Martin Wiesmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Olfactory and trigeminal interaction of menthol and nicotine in humans.

Authors:  Bertold Renner; Karen Schreiber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Prenatal alcohol exposure increases postnatal acceptability of nicotine odor and taste in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Nicole M Mantella; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Chemosensory Contributions of E-Cigarette Additives on Nicotine Use.

Authors:  Natalie L Johnson; Theresa Patten; Minghong Ma; Mariella De Biasi; Daniel W Wesson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 8.  Tobacco Influence on Taste and Smell: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Allessandra Fraga Da Ré; Léia Gonçalves Gurgel; Gabriela Buffon; Weluma Evelyn Rodrigues Moura; Deisi Cristina Gollo Marques Vidor; Márcia Angelica Peter Maahs
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.