Literature DB >> 10916102

Evaluation of duplex ultrasound and captopril renography for detection of renovascular hypertension.

M Johansson1, G Jensen, M Aurell, P Friberg, H Herlitz, H Klingenstierna, R Volkmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renovascular hypertension is the most common form of curable secondary hypertension and, if untreated, may lead to end-stage kidney disease. Given that renal function and hypertension may improve after renal angioplasty, it is pertinent to identify patients with renal artery stenosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate both duplex ultrasound and captopril renography for detection of renal artery stenosis among hypertensive patients.
METHODS: To avoid selection bias, all patients referred to our center for evaluation of renovascular hypertension were asked to participate in the study. Patients were examined by intra-renal duplex ultrasound (N = 121), measuring pulsatility index and acceleration of the blood flow during early systole. In 98 patients, 99mTc-DTPA captopril renography was performed in conjunction with duplex ultrasound. Renal angiography was performed in all patients regardless of the results of the noninvasive tests.
RESULTS: The prevalence of renal artery stenosis was 19%. In the 98 patients examined by both duplex ultrasound and captopril renography, sensitivity and positive predictive values for detection of a renal artery stenosis of 50% degree or more were 84 and 76%, respectively, for duplex ultrasound, whereas captopril renography was associated with a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 68% for both (P = NS). Specificity and negative predictive values were 94 and 96%, respectively, for duplex ultrasound, whereas the corresponding values for captopril renography were 92% for both (P = NS). Specificity and negative predictive values were 94 and 96%, respectively, for duplex ultrasound, whereas the corresponding values for captopril renography were 92% for both (P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Both duplex ultrasound and captopril renography are associated with high specificity and negative predictive values for detection of renal artery stenosis. Sensitivity and positive predictive values are at least as good for duplex ultrasound compared with captopril renography. Given that duplex ultrasound is easier to perform and more cost effective, we propose that it should be the method of first choice when screening for renal artery stenosis in a hypertensive population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10916102     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  13 in total

Review 1.  An evidence-based approach to diagnosing renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  M J Bloch
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  T Leiner; M W de Haan; P J Nelemans; J M A van Engelshoven; G B C Vasbinder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Role of color-Doppler sonography in the follow-up of renal artery stenting.

Authors:  G C Parenti; D Palmarini; M Bilzoni; P Campioni; P Mannella; A Ginevra
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Neuroendocrinology and its quantitative development: a bioengineering view.

Authors:  Max E Valentinuzzi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Renal Doppler evaluation in the child with hypertension: a reasonable screening discriminator?

Authors:  Sumit Chhadia; Richard A Cohn; Gulsah Vural; James S Donaldson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-07-17

6.  Captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pediatric hypertension.

Authors:  György Sandor Reusz; Eva Kis; Orsolya Cseprekál; Attila Jozsef Szabó; Eva Kis
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Pre- and postcaptopril renal scintigraphy as a screening test for renovascular hypertension in children.

Authors:  Sameh Abdulsamea; Peter Anderson; Lorenzo Biassoni; Eileen Brennan; Clare A McLaren; Stephen D Marks; Derek J Roebuck; Sabry Selim; Kjell Tullus
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Update on imaging for suspected renovascular hypertension in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Stephen D Marks; Kjell Tullus
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Renovascular hypertension associated with pseudoaneurysm following blunt trauma.

Authors:  Eric Judd; Mark E Lockhart; Dana V Rizk
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 10.  Imaging in the evaluation of renovascular disease.

Authors:  Kjell Tullus; Derek J Roebuck; Clare A McLaren; Stephen D Marks
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.