Literature DB >> 10915671

Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT.

N S Curry1, S T Cochran, N K Bissada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the practical usefulness of the Bosniak classification system for separating surgical from nonsurgical cystic renal masses in a large number of patients examined with properly performed renal CT. The study included only patients whose scans were technically adequate to allow proper assignment of the lesion to a category.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The scans of 109 patients were gathered from two large teaching institutions both prospectively and retrospectively, yielding a total of 116 analyzable renal cystic lesions. Eighty-two masses were resected from 77 of these patients, retrospectively categorized by two experienced uroradiologists using the Bosniak classification system, and correlated with pathology reports. A second group of 34 lesions in 32 patients with atypical cysts was followed up prospectively for periods ranging from 3 months to 10 years.
RESULTS: The results were similar for the two institutions: 15 resected categories I and II lesions were correctly identified as benign, and all 18 category IV lesions were malignant. Twenty-nine (59%) of 49 pooled category III masses were malignant. No malignancies have been identified in the prospectively monitored group of patients.
CONCLUSION: Our results are compared with earlier, smaller series and support those that show that the Bosniak classification system is useful in separating lesions requiring surgery from those that can be safely followed up, provided proper CT techniques are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10915671     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  27 in total

1.  Guidelines on the management of renal cyst disease.

Authors:  Thomas F Whelan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.

Authors:  Richard FitzGerald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CUA guideline on the management of cystic renal lesions.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Philippe D Violette; Michael A S Jewett; Frederic Pouliot; Michael Leveridge; Alan So; Thomas F Whelan; Ricardo Rendon; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Bosniak Category IIF Complex Renal Cysts in Korean Patients.

Authors:  Jong Ho Hwang; Chang Ki Lee; Ho Song Yu; Kang Su Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 5.  [Diagnostic algorithm in cystic renal masses].

Authors:  D-A Clevert; A Horng; M Staehler; N Haseke; C Stief; M Reiser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Bernd Straub; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

Review 7.  Complex renal cystic masses: current standards and controversies.

Authors:  Peter Weibl; Tobias Klatte; Matthias Waldert; Mesut Remzi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidney: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Sheng F Oon; Robert W Foley; Deirdre Quinn; David M Quinlan; Robert G Gibney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  The renal effects of ALK inhibitors.

Authors:  Hassan Izzedine; Rania Kheder El-Fekih; Mark A Perazella
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  Biopsy of renal masses: when and why.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.