Literature DB >> 10914724

INK4a gene expression and methylation in primary breast cancer: overexpression of p16INK4a messenger RNA is a marker of poor prognosis.

R Hui1, R D Macmillan, F S Kenny, E A Musgrove, R W Blamey, R I Nicholson, J F Robertson, R L Sutherland.   

Abstract

Frequent deletions or mutations of the INK4 gene, which encodes the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor p16INK4a, have been documented in various human cancers, but little is known about the role of this tumor suppressor gene in primary breast cancer. We examined p16INK4a mRNA expression and its relationship with cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor (ER) expression in 314 primary breast cancers using Northern blots probed with a p16 exon 1alpha-specific cDNA. Tumor samples overexpressing p16INK4a were predominantly ER negative with low levels of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 and ER mRNA levels in the high p16INK4a expressers were significantly lower than those in the remainder of the population (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, the mean p16INK4a mRNA level in the ER-negative tumors was significantly higher than that in the ER-positive group (P = 0.0001). Because the INK4 gene is frequently inactivated by de novo methylation, we investigated the frequency of INK4a exon 1alpha methylation in a subset of 120 primary breast cancers using methylation-specific PCR; 24 of these were methylated. These findings indicate that high expression of p16INK4a and reduced expression due to de novo INK4a methylation are frequent events in primary breast cancer. In a subset of 217 patients for whom detailed clinical data were available, high p16INK4a mRNA expression was associated with high tumor grade (P = 0.006), > or = 4 axillary lymph node involvement (P = 0.004), ER negativity (P = 0.0001), and increased risk of relapse (P = 0.006). The significant negative correlation between p16INK4a and ER gene expression raises issues regarding their functional interrelationships and whether high p16INK4a expression may be associated with a lack of hormone responsiveness in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10914724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  41 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: current and new predictors of metastasis.

Authors:  D F Hayes; C Isaacs; V Stearns
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Cancer progression modeling using static sample data.

Authors:  Yijun Sun; Jin Yao; Norma J Nowak; Steve Goodison
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  Analysis of DNA methylation of multiple genes in microdissected cells from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Dimo Dietrich; Ralf Lesche; Reimo Tetzner; Manuel Krispin; Jörn Dietrich; Wolfgang Haedicke; Matthias Schuster; Glen Kristiansen
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  RB in breast cancer: differential effects in estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibits the translational repressor 4E-BP1 to promote cap-dependent translation during mitosis-G1 transition.

Authors:  Dylan C Mitchell; Arya Menon; Amanda L Garner
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors.

Authors:  Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Caroline Miller; Krystyna Kozakeiwicz; Karen Chew; Dan Moore; Joseph Rabban; Yunn Yi Chen; Karla Kerlikowske; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  QM-FISH analysis of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Yingbo Shao; Guofang Hou; Jingchao Bai; Weiping Yuan; Linping Hu; Tao Cheng; Anders Zetterberg; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-05

Review 8.  Tailoring to RB: tumour suppressor status and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Erik S Knudsen; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Exploring the gain of function contribution of AKT to mammary tumorigenesis in mouse models.

Authors:  Carmen Blanco-Aparicio; Marta Cañamero; Yolanda Cecilia; Belén Pequeño; Oliver Renner; Irene Ferrer; Amancio Carnero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The functional loss of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor is a common event in basal-like and luminal B breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Xiaping He; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.