Literature DB >> 10914543

Prognostic factors in children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia (excluding children with Down syndrome and acute promyelocytic leukemia): univariate and recursive partitioning analysis of patients treated on Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) Study 8821.

M Chang1, S C Raimondi, Y Ravindranath, A J Carroll, B Camitta, M V Gresik, C P Steuber, H Weinstein.   

Abstract

The purpose of the paper was to define clinical or biological features associated with the risk for treatment failure for children with acute myeloid leukemia. Data from 560 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who entered the Pediatric Oncology Group Study 8821 from June 1988 to March 1993 were analyzed by univariate and recursive partitioning methods. Children with Down syndrome or acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded from the study. Factors examined included age, number of leukocytes, sex, FAB morphologic subtype, cytogenetic findings, and extramedullary disease at the time of diagnosis. The overall event-free survival (EFS) rate at 4 years was 32.7% (s.e. = 2.2%). Age > or =2 years, fewer than 50 x 10(9)/I leukocytes, and t(8;21) or inv(16), and normal chromosomes were associated with higher rates of EFS (P value = 0.003, 0.049, 0.0003, 0.031, respectively), whereas the M5 subtype of AML (P value = 0.0003) and chromosome abnormalities other than t(8;21) and inv(16) were associated with lower rates of EFS (P value = 0.0001). Recursive partitioning analysis defined three groups of patients with widely varied prognoses: female patients with t(8;21), inv(16), or a normal karyotype (n = 89) had the best prognosis (4-year EFS = 55.1%, s.e. = 5.7%); male patients with t(8;21), inv(16) or normal chromosomes (n = 106) had an intermediate prognosis (4-year EFS = 38.1%, s.e. = 5.3%); patients with chromosome abnormalities other than t(8;21) and inv(16) (n = 233) had the worst prognosis (4-year EFS = 27.0%, s.e. = 3.2%). One hundred and thirty-two patients (24%) could not be grouped because of missing cytogenetic data, mainly due to inadequate marrow samples. The results suggest that pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia can be categorized into three potential risk groups for prognosis and that differences in sex and chromosomal abnormalities are associated with differences in estimates of EFS. These results are tentative and must be confirmed by a large prospective clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10914543     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  10 in total

1.  The presence of central nervous system disease at diagnosis in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia does not affect survival: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Donna L Johnston; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Beverly J Lange; William G Woods
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Molecular signatures in childhood acute leukemia and their correlations to expression patterns in normal hematopoietic subpopulations.

Authors:  Anna Andersson; Tor Olofsson; David Lindgren; Björn Nilsson; Cecilia Ritz; Patrik Edén; Carin Lassen; Johan Råde; Magnus Fontes; Helena Mörse; Jesper Heldrup; Mikael Behrendtz; Felix Mitelman; Mattias Höglund; Bertil Johansson; Thoas Fioretos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  E Abella; Y Ravindranath
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Clinical Impact of Additional Cytogenetic Aberrations, cKIT and RAS Mutations, and Treatment Elements in Pediatric t(8;21)-AML: Results From an International Retrospective Study by the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group.

Authors:  Kim Klein; Gertjan Kaspers; Christine J Harrison; H Berna Beverloo; Ardine Reedijk; Mathilda Bongers; Jacqueline Cloos; Andrea Pession; Dirk Reinhardt; Martin Zimmerman; Ursula Creutzig; Michael Dworzak; Todd Alonzo; Donna Johnston; Betsy Hirsch; Michal Zapotocky; Barbara De Moerloose; Alcira Fynn; Vincent Lee; Takashi Taga; Akio Tawa; Anne Auvrignon; Bernward Zeller; Erik Forestier; Carmen Salgado; Walentyna Balwierz; Alexander Popa; Jeffrey Rubnitz; Susana Raimondi; Brenda Gibson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Recent advances in management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Authors:  Manasi Shah; Bharat Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Identification and characterization of novel AML1-ETO fusion transcripts in pediatric t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  K M LaFiura; H Edwards; J W Taub; L H Matherly; J A Fontana; A N Mohamed; Y Ravindranath; Y Ge
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Sex disparity in childhood and young adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) survival: Evidence from US population data.

Authors:  Md Jobayer Hossain; Li Xie
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Prognostic factors and risk-based therapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Soheil Meshinchi; Franklin O Smith; Robert J Arceci
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Hemophagocytic syndrome in children with acute monoblastic leukemia-another cause of fever of unknown origin.

Authors:  H Lackner; M G Seidel; V Strenger; P Sovinz; W Schwinger; M Benesch; D Sperl; C Urban
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Overexpression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in childhood de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ki Woong Sung; Jaewon Choi; Yu Kyeong Hwang; Sang Jin Lee; Hee-Jin Kim; Ju Youn Kim; Eun Joo Cho; Keon Hee Yoo; Hong Hoe Koo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.