Literature DB >> 10914350

The Case Western Reserve University hybrid gait orthosis.

E B Marsolais1, R Kobetic, G Polando, K Ferguson, S Tashman, R Gaudio, S Nandurkar, H R Lehneis.   

Abstract

Six individuals with paraplegia and injury levels from C-1 through T-12 participated in a study to evaluate the functional capabilities of a hybrid gait orthotic system. Subjects learned to use a custom-built reciprocal gait orthosis without stimulation and with electrical stimulation activating between 4 and 16 muscles. Outcomes were scored with standard physical therapy measures including the Tinetti test, a timed get up and go, Borg rating of perceived exertion, and the Functional Index Measure (FIM). Subjects have successfully accomplished sit to stand, stand to sit, and walking maneuvers measured for time, speed, and distance. Metabolic consumption was measured for walking in the light work region of 5.1 to 6.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) 1 MET = 3.5 ml of O2/kg/min with hybrid gait orthosis. Perceived exertion as measured with the Borg scale indicated that use of the bracing system with functional electrical stimulation was "easier" than without stimulation. Subjects using a hybrid system were able to walk up to 350 m at average speeds of 0.25 m/s. Walking speeds for 30- and 50-meter distances reached 0.45 m/s. Additionally, walking distances with stimulation were 2 times greater than those of non-stimulated reciprocal gait. FIM scores indicated that system users would become slightly more independent in mobility. Results were used to determine the most useful brace modifications for the next generation of Case Western Reserve University hybrid gait orthoses to allow an expanded function that will include stair climbing and side stepping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10914350     DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2000.11753516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  7 in total

1.  Stance control knee mechanism for lower-limb support in hybrid neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Curtis S To; Rudi Kobetic; Thomas C Bulea; Musa L Audu; John R Schnellenberger; Gilles Pinault; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

Review 2.  The influence of orthosis options on walking parameters in spinal cord-injured patients: a literature review.

Authors:  M Arazpour; M Samadian; K Ebrahimzadeh; M Ahmadi Bani; S W Hutchins
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  The efficiency of orthotic interventions on energy consumption in paraplegic patients: a literature review.

Authors:  M Arazpour; M Samadian; M Bahramizadeh; M Joghtaei; M Maleki; M Ahmadi Bani; S W Hutchins
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  A systematic review of the efficacy of gait rehabilitation strategies for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tania Lam; Janice J Eng; Dalton L Wolfe; Jane T Hsieh; Maura Whittaker
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Rehabilitation robotics.

Authors:  H I Krebs; B T Volpe
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

6.  Stance controlled knee flexion improves stimulation driven walking after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Thomas C Bulea; Rudi Kobetic; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Effect of exoskeletal joint constraint and passive resistance on metabolic energy expenditure: Implications for walking in paraplegia.

Authors:  Sarah R Chang; Rudi Kobetic; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.