Literature DB >> 10912753

Home blood pressure normalcy: the Didima study.

G S Stergiou1, G C Thomopoulou, I I Skeva, T D Mountokalakis.   

Abstract

To evaluate reference values of home blood pressure (HBP) a cross-sectional community study was conducted on 694 adult subjects (aged > or = 18 years) of the village Didima in southern Greece (participation rate 76.4%). Clinic blood pressure (CBP) was measured on two visits (triplicate measurements, mercury sphygmomanometer) and HBP on 3 workdays (duplicate morning and evening measurements, oscillometric devices; Omron HEM 705CP). After exclusion of 132 subjects (103 treated hypertensives and 29 with incomplete data), 562 subjects were analyzed (mean +/- SD aged 51.2 +/- 17.2 years, 42.7% men). Average HBP (120.0 +/- 17.8/72.6 +/- 8.8 mm Hg, systolic/diastolic) was strongly correlated (P < .0001) with CBP (118.7 +/- 17.7/73.8 +/- 10.5 mm Hg). Systolic CBP was 1.3 mm Hg lower than HBP (P < .01, 95% confidence interval 0.4, 2.2), whereas diastolic CBP was 1.2 mm Hg higher than HBP (P < .0001, 95% confidence interval 0.6, 1.7). The threshold of HBP normality determined using three different approaches was 1) 139.7/83.0 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) using the distribution criterion (95th percentile of the HBP distribution among 476 normotensive subjects); 2) 139.7/85.8 mm Hg using the correspondence criterion (the percentiles of the CBP distribution that correspond to CBP > or = 140/90 mm Hg were estimated, and the levels of BP that correspond to these same percentiles on the HBP distribution were calculated); and 3) 137.4/82.7 mm Hg using the regression criterion (calculation of the levels of HBP that correspond to CBP of 140/90 mm Hg using the regression equation between HBP and CBP). Overall, the findings of the three criteria suggest that average HBP < 137/82 mm Hg might be considered as probably normal, > 140/86 mm Hg as probably abnormal, and within these limits as borderline. Until mortality-based prospective data are available, this approach might be useful in the interpretation of HBP in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10912753     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00266-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  6 in total

Review 1.  Self-measurement of blood pressure at home in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Hilde Celis; Elly Den Hond; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-02

2.  Age and the difference between awake ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joji Ishikawa; Yukiko Ishikawa; Donald Edmondson; Thomas G Pickering; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 3.  Role of ambulatory and home blood pressure recording in clinical practice.

Authors:  Nimrta Ghuman; Patrick Campbell; William B White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  What is the optimal interval between successive home blood pressure readings using an automated oscillometric device?

Authors:  Kazuo Eguchi; Sujith Kuruvilla; Gbenga Ogedegbe; William Gerin; Joseph E Schwartz; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 5.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 6.  The applicability of home blood pressure measurement in clinical practice: a review of literature.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Abraham A Kroon; Heidi A Jongen-Vancraybex; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.