Literature DB >> 10911654

Assessment of the effectiveness, safety, and biocompatibility of icodextrin in automated peritoneal dialysis. The Dextrin in APD in Amsterdam (DIANA) Group.

N Posthuma1, P M ter Wee, A J Donker, P L Oe, E M Peers, H A Verbrugh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study assessed the efficacy, safety, and biocompatibility of icodextrin (I) solution compared to glucose (G) solution as the daytime dwell in continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD).
DESIGN: In a randomized, open, prospective, parallel group study of two year's duration, either I or G was used for the long daytime dwell in CCPD patients.
METHOD: The study was carried out in a university hospital and teaching hospital. Established CCPD patients and patients new to the modality were both included. Clinic visits were made at three-month intervals. In all patients, clinical data were gathered; ultrafiltration (UF) was recorded; and serum, urine, and dialysate samples and effluents were collected. Peritoneal defense characteristics and mesothelial markers were determined. Every six months, peritoneal kinetics studies were performed, and serum samples for icodextrin metabolites were taken.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (19 G, 19 I) started the study. The median follow-up was 16 months and 17 months respectively (range: 0.5 - 26 months and 3 - 26 months, respectively). Daytime UF volumes increased significantly (p < 0.001), and 24-hour UF tended to increase from baseline in the I group. Dialysate creatinine clearance increased non significantly in both groups over time. In I patients, serum disaccharides (maltose) concentration increased from 0.05+/-0.01 mg/mL [mean+/- standard error of mean (SEM)] at baseline, to an average concentration in the follow-up visits of 1.15+/- 0.04 mg/mL (p <0.001). At the same time, serum sodium levels decreased from 138.1 +/- 0.7 mmol/L to an average concentration in the follow-up visits of 135.9 +/- 0.8 mmol/L (p < 0.050). At 12 months, the serum sodium concentration increased to a non significant difference from baseline. Serum osmolality increased, but did not differ significantly from G users at any visit. During peritonitis (P), daytime dwell UF decreased significantly compared to non peritonitis (NP) episodes in G patients (p < 0.0 01), but remained stable in I patients. Total 24-hour UF also decreased in G patients (p < 0.001), but not in I patients. In these I patients, serum disaccharides increased from 0.05 +/- 0.01 mg/mL to 1.26 +/- 0.2 mg/mL during follow-up. During peritonitis, serum disaccharides concentration did not increase further (1.47 +/- 0.2 mg/mL, p= 0.56). Thirty P episodes occurred during follow-up: 16 in G patients and 14 in I patients (1 per 17.6 months and 1 per 21.9 months, respectively.) After one year, absolute number and percentage of effluent peritoneal macrophages (PM phi s) were significantly higher in I patients than in G patients. The difference in percentage persisted after two years. The phagocytic capacity of PM phi s decreased over time, resulting in a borderline significant difference for coagulase-negative staphylococci phagocytosis (p=0.005) and a significant difference for E. coli phagocytosis (p <0.05) in favor of I patients. PM phi oxidative metabolism, PM phi cytokine production, and effluent opsonic capacity remained stable over time with no difference between the groups. Mass transfer area coefficients (MTACs) and clearances were stable and appeared unaffected by G or I treatment. Effluent cancer antigen 125 (CA125) was stable in G users and tended to decrease in I users. Effluent interleukin-8 (IL-8), carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP ), and amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) did not change over time and did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSION: The use of I for the long daytime dwell in CCPD led to an increase in total UF of at least 261 mL per day, which was maintained over at least 24 months. During I treatment, serum I metabolites increased significantly and serum sodium concentrations decreased initially. As a result, serum osmolality increased slightly. Clinical adverse effects did not accompany these findings. The UF gain in the I patients was even higher during P, without a

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10911654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  18 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic targets and peritoneal membrane remodeling.

Authors:  Karima Farhat; Andrea W D Stavenuiter; Rob H J Beelen; Piet M Ter Wee
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Solutions for peritoneal dialysis in children: recommendations by the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group.

Authors:  Claus Peter Schmitt; Sevcan A Bakkaloglu; Günter Klaus; Cornelis Schröder; Michel Fischbach
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  An update on peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Elvia García-López; Bengt Lindholm; Simon Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  A patient with refractory nephrotic syndrome withdrawn from peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Satoshi Morimoto; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Kazunori Someya; Tatsuyori Morita; Fusakazu Jo; Nagaoki Toyoda; Atsushi Kosaki; Mitsushige Nishikawa; Toshiji Iwasaka
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 5.  Optimizing peritoneal dialysis prescription for volume control: the importance of varying dwell time and dwell volume.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Ariane Zaloszyc; Betti Schaefer; Claus Peter Schmitt
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Comparison of Blood Pressure Control and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD).

Authors:  Jong Soon Jang; Soon Kil Kwon; Hye-Young Kim
Journal:  Electrolyte Blood Press       Date:  2011-06-30

7.  Two icodextrin exchanges per day in peritoneal dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure: one center's experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Periklis Dousdampanis; Konstantza Trigka; Maggie Chu; Saimah Khan; Daniele Venturoli; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Icodextrin and peritoneal dialysis: advantages and new applications.

Authors:  Periklis Dousdampanis; Carlos Guido Musso; Konstantina Trigka
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Bimodal solutions or twice-daily icodextrin to enhance ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Periklis Dousdampanis; Konstantina Trigka; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.