Literature DB >> 10910899

The immunophenotype of 177 adults with acute myeloid leukemia: proposal of a prognostic score.

O Legrand1, J Y Perrot, M Baudard, A Cordier, R Lautier, G Simonin, R Zittoun, N Casadevall, J P Marie.   

Abstract

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, a variety of clinical and biologic parameters, including phenotype, have been examined for potential value in predicting treatment response and survival. The European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukaemias (EGIL) has proposed that AML be defined immunologically by the expression of 2 or more of the following myeloid markers: myeloperoxidase, CD13, CD33, CDw65, and CD117. With regard to this classification, the prognostic significance of 21 antigens taken separately and with immunophenotypic subgroups were evaluated and compared with other clinical and biological variables in 177 adult AML patients. None of the antigens tested were associated with treatment outcome. In contrast, patients with blasts disclosing a full expression of panmyeloid phenotype (defined by the expression of all 5 myeloid markers) had a higher complete remission rate (P <. 0001) and differed significantly in disease-free survival (P =.02) and overall survival (P =.008) than patients whose cells expressed fewer than 5 of these markers. In multivariate analysis, only age, panmyeloid phenotype, performance status, and permeability glycoprotein activity influence treatment outcome. Cytogenetics was significant in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis, most likely because of the redundancy with panmyeloid phenotype and a higher sensitivity of immunophenotyping. Patients whose cells exhibit the panmyeloid phenotype appear to define a relatively homogeneous biological subset of AML. The 4 independent prognostic factors were used to create a prognostic score, defined by the number of factors present. This score permitted a stratification of patients with AML, thereby allowing for the consideration of innovative therapies to improve outcome in the poorer outcome groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10910899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  24 in total

1.  Phase I studies of AVE9633, an anti-CD33 antibody-maytansinoid conjugate, in adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Simona Lapusan; Maria B Vidriales; Xavier Thomas; Stephane de Botton; Anne Vekhoff; Ruoping Tang; Charles Dumontet; Rodica Morariu-Zamfir; John M Lambert; Marie-Laure Ozoux; Philippe Poncelet; Jesus F San Miguel; Ollivier Legrand; Daniel J DeAngelo; Francis J Giles; Jean-Pierre Marie
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Randomized phase IIb study of low-dose cytarabine and lintuzumab versus low-dose cytarabine and placebo in older adults with untreated acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Jeffrey E Lancet; Brent L Wood; Laurie E Grove; Larissa Sandalic; Eric L Sievers; Joseph G Jurcic
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  The EMA Review of Mylotarg (Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin) for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Sahra Ali; Helen-Marie Dunmore; Dominik Karres; Justin L Hay; Tomas Salmonsson; Christian Gisselbrecht; Sinan B Sarac; Ole W Bjerrum; Doris Hovgaard; Yolanda Barbachano; Nithyanandan Nagercoil; Francesco Pignatti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-21

4.  Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles conjugated with an anti-CD33 antibody and a p53-activating peptide for acute myeloid leukemia therapy.

Authors:  Fan Niu; Jin Yan; Bohan Ma; Shichao Li; Yongping Shao; Pengcheng He; Wanggang Zhang; Wangxiao He; Peter X Ma; Wuyuan Lu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Basic and clinical immunology of Siglecs.

Authors:  Stephan von Gunten; Bruce S Bochner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Aberrant phenotypes in childhood and adult acute leukemia and its association with adverse prognostic factors and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Bharat Bhushan; Pradeep Singh Chauhan; Sumita Saluja; Saurabh Verma; Ashwani Kumar Mishra; Saeed Siddiqui; Sujala Kapur
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Prognostic significance of CD7+CD56+ phenotype and chromosome 5 abnormalities for acute myeloid leukemia M0.

Authors:  Ritsuro Suzuki; Makoto Murata; Masahiro Kami; Shigeki Ohtake; Norio Asou; Yoshihisa Kodera; Masao Tomonaga; Yasufumi Masaki; Shuya Kusumoto; Jin Takeuchi; Shin Matsuda; Hisamaru Hirai; m Seiichi Yorimitsu; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Masao Seto; Masanori Shimoyama; Ryuzo Ohno; Yasuo Morishima; Shigeo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Prognostic significance of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian A Webber; Melissa M Cushing; Shiyong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-01-01

9.  A recurrent immunophenotype at diagnosis independently identifies high-risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  L Eidenschink Brodersen; T A Alonzo; A J Menssen; R B Gerbing; L Pardo; A P Voigt; S B Kahwash; B Hirsch; S Raimondi; A S Gamis; S Meshinchi; M R Loken
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Licensure of gemtuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of selected patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse.

Authors:  Mark S Berger; Lance H Leopold; James A Dowell; Joan M Korth-Bradley; Matthew L Sherman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.