Literature DB >> 10910483

Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure difference during laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy.

K Bhavani-Shankar1, R A Steinbrook, D C Brooks, S Datta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about whether capnography is adequate to monitor pulmonary ventilation to reduce the risk of significant respiratory acidosis in pregnant patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. In this prospective study, changes in arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure difference (PaCO2--PetCO2), induced by carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, were determined in pregnant patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Eight pregnant women underwent general anesthesia at 17-30 weeks of gestation. Carbon dioxide pnueumoperitoneum was initiated after obtaining arterial blood for gas analysis. Pulmonary ventilation was adjusted to maintain PetCO2 around 32 mmHg during the procedure. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed during insufflation, after the termination of insufflation, after extubation, and in the postoperative period.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD for PaCO2--PetCO2 was 2.4 +/- 1.5 before carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, 2.6 +/- 1.2 during, and 1.9 +/- 1.4 mmHg after termination of pneumoperitoneum. PaCO2 and pH during pneumoperitoneum were 35 +/- 1.7 mmHg and 7.41 +/- 0.02, respectively. There were no significant differences in either mean PaCO2--PetCO2 or PaCO2 and pH during various phases of laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Capnography is adequate to guide ventilation during laparoscopic surgery in pregnant patients. Respiratory acidosis did not occur when PetCO2 was maintained at 32 mmHg during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10910483     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy: this statement was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Hori Yumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Heidi Jackson; Steven Granger; Raymond Price; Michael Rollins; David Earle; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pearl; Raymond Price; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Raymond R Price; Allison E Tonkin; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Abdominal surgery in pregnancy--an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Erich Solomayer; Martin Strik; Christoph Raspé
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients.

Authors:  T C Cox; C R Huntington; L J Blair; T Prasad; A E Lincourt; V A Augenstein; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Suspicion of acute appendicitis in the third trimester of pregnancy: pros and cons of a laparoscopic procedure.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; D Boerma
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Evidence-Based Guideline on Laparoscopy in Pregnancy: Commissioned by the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) Endorsed by the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG).

Authors:  E Ball; N Waters; N Cooper; C Talati; R Mallick; S Rabas; A Mukherjee; Y Sri Ranjan; M Thaha; R Doodia; R Keedwell; M Madhra; N Kuruba; R Malhas; E Gaughan; K Tompsett; H Gibson; H Wright; C Gnanachandran; T Hookaway; C Baker; K Murali; D Jurkovic; N Amso; J Clark; S Thangaratinam; T Chalhoub; P Kaloo; E Saridogan
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

9.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Hadi Ahmadi Amoli; Hassan Tavakoli; Ali Yaghoubi Notash; Maryam Sajad Far; Patricia Khashayar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 10.  Anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy.

Authors:  Madhusudan Upadya; P J Saneesh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.