Literature DB >> 10910109

Response profiles to texture border patterns in area V1.

H C Nothdurft1, J L Gallant, D C Van Essen.   

Abstract

Cells in area V1 of the anesthetized macaque monkey were stimulated with large texture patterns composed of homogeneous regions of line elements (texels) with different orientations. To human observers, such patterns appear to segregate, with the percept of sharp boundaries between texture regions. Our objective was to investigate whether the boundaries are reflected in the responses of single cells in V1. We measured responses to individual texels at different distances from the texture border. For each cell, patterns of optimally or orthogonally orientated texels were adjusted so that only one texel fell into the receptive field and all other texels fell in the visually unresponsive regions outside. In 37 out of 156 neurons tested (24%), texels immediately adjacent to a texture border evoked reliably larger responses than identical texels farther away from the border. In 17 neurons (11%), responses to texels near the border were relatively reduced. Border enhancement effects were generally stronger than border attenuation effects. When tested with four different border configurations (two global orientations and two edge polarities), many cells showed reliable effects for only one or two configurations, consistent with cells encoding information about the orientation of the texture border or its location with respect to the segmented region. Across the sample, enhancement effects were similar for all texture borders. Modulation by the texture surround was predominantly suppressive; even the responses near texture borders were smaller than those to a single line. We compared these results with the results of a popout test in which the line in the receptive field was surrounded by homogeneous texture fields either orthogonal or parallel to the center line. The patterns of response modulation and the temporal onset of differential responses were similar in the two tests, suggesting that the two perceptual phenomena are mediated by similar neural mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10910109     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800173092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  22 in total

1.  Influence of the direction of elemental luminance gradients on the responses of V4 cells to textured surfaces.

Authors:  A Hanazawa; H Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The clinical translation of a measure of gain control: the contrast-contrast effect task.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; Steve C Dakin; James Gold; Steven J Luck; Angus Macdonald; John D Ragland; Steven Silverstein; Milton E Strauss
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Glass pattern responses in macaque V2 neurons.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith; Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Occipital network for figure/ground organization.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Possible functions of contextual modulations and receptive field nonlinearities: pop-out and texture segmentation.

Authors:  Anita M Schmid; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Responses to orientation discontinuities in V1 and V2: physiological dissociations and functional implications.

Authors:  Anita M Schmid; Keith P Purpura; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impaired texture segregation but spared contour integration following damage to right posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Johan Wagemans; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Image segmentation driven by elements of form.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The processing of feature discontinuities for different cue types in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Anita M Schmid
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.