STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study of the rigidity of various scoliosis constructs instrumented with and without caudal pedicle screw anchors and with none, one, or two cross-link devices. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the increased torsional rigidity provided by distal pedicle screw fixation might make cross-linking unnecessary. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws and cross-linking devices have been shown to increase the structural rigidity of spinal constructs. Their relative contributions to scoliosis construct rigidity has not been determined. METHODS: "Short" (T2-T11) and "long" (T2-L3) scoliosis constructs were mounted on an industrially fabricated spine model and tested in a hydraulic testing machine. Four different short and four different long constructs were tested: hooks only, hooks with concave side thoracic sublaminar wires, hooks with distal pedicle screw anchors, and hooks, distal pedicle screw anchors, and concave thoracic sublaminar wires. There were four iterations for each construct tested: no cross-links, one superior cross-link at T4-T5, one inferior cross-link at T9-T10, and two cross-links. Torsional rigidity was tested by applying a rotational torque at T2. Vertebral body motion was recorded with a three-dimensional video analysis system. RESULTS: Constructs with distal pedicle screws were statistically more rigid in torsion than those with hooks as distal anchors. The additional torsional rigidity from one or more cross-links was negligible compared with that provided by pedicle screws. CONCLUSIONS: With pedicle screws as distal anchors in scoliosis constructs, cross-linking with one or two devices adds very little additional rotational stiffness and may be unnecessary in many cases.
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study of the rigidity of various scoliosis constructs instrumented with and without caudal pedicle screw anchors and with none, one, or two cross-link devices. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the increased torsional rigidity provided by distal pedicle screw fixation might make cross-linking unnecessary. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws and cross-linking devices have been shown to increase the structural rigidity of spinal constructs. Their relative contributions to scoliosis construct rigidity has not been determined. METHODS: "Short" (T2-T11) and "long" (T2-L3) scoliosis constructs were mounted on an industrially fabricated spine model and tested in a hydraulic testing machine. Four different short and four different long constructs were tested: hooks only, hooks with concave side thoracic sublaminar wires, hooks with distal pedicle screw anchors, and hooks, distal pedicle screw anchors, and concave thoracic sublaminar wires. There were four iterations for each construct tested: no cross-links, one superior cross-link at T4-T5, one inferior cross-link at T9-T10, and two cross-links. Torsional rigidity was tested by applying a rotational torque at T2. Vertebral body motion was recorded with a three-dimensional video analysis system. RESULTS: Constructs with distal pedicle screws were statistically more rigid in torsion than those with hooks as distal anchors. The additional torsional rigidity from one or more cross-links was negligible compared with that provided by pedicle screws. CONCLUSIONS: With pedicle screws as distal anchors in scoliosis constructs, cross-linking with one or two devices adds very little additional rotational stiffness and may be unnecessary in many cases.
Authors: Gang Li; Guohua Lv; Peter Passias; Michal Kozanek; Umesh S Metkar; Zhongjun Liu; Kirkham B Wood; Lubos Rehak; Youwen Deng Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 3.134