Literature DB >> 10908739

Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages.

K K Nagy1, R R Roberts, K T Joseph, R F Smith, G C An, F Bokhari, J Barrett.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to confirm the safety and efficacy of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) for trauma patients. A prospectively maintained database of all DPLs performed in the past 75 months was analyzed. A red blood cell count of 100,000/mm(3) was considered positive for injury in blunt trauma; 10,000/mm(3) was considered positive for peritoneal penetration in penetrating trauma. Information relative to type of injury, DPL result, laparotomy result and complications, was analysed to determine if DPL was more or less suited to any specific indication or type of patient. Over a 75 month period, 2501 DPLs were performed at our urban level I trauma center. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the above thresholds were 95, 99 and 98%. The majority (2409, 96%) were performed using percutaneous or "closed" seldinger technique. Ninety-two (4%) were performed using open technique because of pelvic fractures, previous scars and pregnancy. Open DPL was less sensitive than closed DPL in patients who sustained blunt trauma (90 vs 95%) but slightly more sensitive in determining penetration (100 vs 96%). Overall, there were 21 complications (0.8%). There was no difference in complication rate between open and closed DPL. In conclusion, DPL remains a highly accurate, sensitive and specific test with an extremely low complication rate. It can be performed either open or closed with comparable results. We recommend its use in the evaluation of both blunt and penetrating trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10908739     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00010-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  21 in total

1.  Intestinal injury from blunt abdominal trauma: a study of 47 cases.

Authors:  Madhumita Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2009-10

2.  [The value of sonography in traumatology and orthopedics : Part 2: emergency diagnostics in blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma].

Authors:  J V Wening; C Tesch; J Huhnholz; B Friemert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Diagnosis and management of colonic injuries following blunt trauma.

Authors:  Yi-Xiong Zheng; Li Chen; Si-Feng Tao; Ping Song; Shao-Ming Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Investigation of blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Jan O Jansen; Steven R Yule; Malcolm A Loudon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

Review 5.  New approaches to gastric cancer staging: beyond endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Hyuk Yoon; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Isolated Mesenteric Vascular Injury Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma Leading to Massive Segmental Gangrene of Small Gut: A Case Report.

Authors:  Sibabrata Kar; Vandana Mohapatra; Pratap Kumar Rath
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

7.  Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: current practice in Taiwan.

Authors:  C-F Chong; T-L Wang; H Chang
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Prospective evaluation of non-radiologist performed emergency abdominal ultrasound for haemoperitoneum.

Authors:  A Brooks; B Davies; M Smethhurst; J Connolly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Management of liver trauma in adults.

Authors:  Nasim Ahmed; Jerome J Vernick
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-01

Review 10.  Management of liver trauma.

Authors:  S A Badger; R Barclay; P Campbell; D J Mole; T Diamond
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.