BACKGROUND: The Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ) are commonly used to measure quality of life (QOL) in heart failure outcomes research. Their comparative responsiveness, however, has not been documented. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among patients attending a university-based heart failure clinic between April 1997 and September 1998. All patients received comprehensive heart failure care management. QOL of patients was assessed by the SF-12 and LHFQ at baseline and 3 months. Of 87 patients completing follow-up, the mean change score was 10.1 for the LHFQ and 5.8 for the SF-12 (both Ps < .001). The change scores of the instruments were correlated (r = 0.61; P < .001). The SF-12 had a greater ability than the LHFQ to statistically detect change in physical health but was less sensitive to changes in mental health. The LHFQ performed better than the SF-12 in the ability to distinguish the differences in perceived global health transition. CONCLUSION: The LHFQ is more responsive than the SF-12 to changes in QOL. The SF-12 should not be used alone to measure the changes in QOL of patients with heart failure.
BACKGROUND: The Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ) are commonly used to measure quality of life (QOL) in heart failure outcomes research. Their comparative responsiveness, however, has not been documented. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among patients attending a university-based heart failure clinic between April 1997 and September 1998. All patients received comprehensive heart failure care management. QOL of patients was assessed by the SF-12 and LHFQ at baseline and 3 months. Of 87 patients completing follow-up, the mean change score was 10.1 for the LHFQ and 5.8 for the SF-12 (both Ps < .001). The change scores of the instruments were correlated (r = 0.61; P < .001). The SF-12 had a greater ability than the LHFQ to statistically detect change in physical health but was less sensitive to changes in mental health. The LHFQ performed better than the SF-12 in the ability to distinguish the differences in perceived global health transition. CONCLUSION: The LHFQ is more responsive than the SF-12 to changes in QOL. The SF-12 should not be used alone to measure the changes in QOL of patients with heart failure.
Authors: Jason Howell; B Michelle Strong; Jenny Weisenberg; Anagha Kakade; Qian Gao; Paul Cuddihy; Susan Delisle; Stan Kachnowski; Mathew S Maurer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jeffery C Huffman; Ariana M Albanese; Kirsti A Campbell; Christopher M Celano; Rachel A Millstein; Carol A Mastromauro; Brian C Healy; Wei-Jean Chung; James L Januzzi; Linda M Collins; Elyse R Park Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Theresa Munyombwe; Stefan Höfer; Donna Fitzsimons; David R Thompson; Deidre Lane; Karen Smith; Felicity Astin Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Olatz Garin; Montse Ferrer; Angels Pont; Montserrat Rué; Anna Kotzeva; Ingela Wiklund; Eric Van Ganse; Jordi Alonso Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Susan J Bennet; Neil B Oldridge; George J Eckert; Jennifer L Embree; Sherry Browning; Nan Hou; Melissa Deer; Michael D Murray Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mathew S Maurer; Paul Cuddihy; Jenny Weisenberg; Susan Delisle; Barbara Michelle Strong; Qian Gao; Stan Kachnowski; Jason Howell Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Zachary I Whinnett; S M Afzal Sohaib; Siana Jones; Andreas Kyriacou; Katherine March; Emma Coady; Jamil Mayet; Alun D Hughes; Michael Frenneaux; Darrel P Francis Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 2.298