Literature DB >> 10907827

National Beef Tenderness Survey-1998.

J C Brooks1, J B Belew, D B Griffin, B L Gwartney, D S Hale, W R Henning, D D Johnson, J B Morgan, F C Parrish, J O Reagan, J W Savell.   

Abstract

Fifty-six retail stores representing 15 retail chains and 14 foodservice facilities in eight U.S. cities were sampled to determine the tenderness of beef steaks at retail and foodservice levels based on Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) values and consumer evaluation panels. Retail consumer panels were conducted at five universities. Each retail and foodservice steak was evaluated using 10-point scales. Steaks were divided into the following quality groups for statistical analysis: Prime, Top Choice, Choice, Select, and Lean or No Roll. Quality group had no effect on WBS values of retail clod, chuck roll, top round, bottom round, eye of round, top loin, top sirloin, or ribeye steaks but did (P < .05) affect values for the T-bone/porterhouse. The percentages of retail top round, eye of round, and bottom round steaks with a WBS force > 3.9 kg were 39.6, 55.9, and 68.0, respectively. Foodservice ribeye, top loin, and top sirloin steaks had WBS values less than 3.4 kg for all quality groups, with Prime ribeye steaks having lower (P < .05) WBS values than ribeyes from the other quality groups. With the exception of the retail ribeye steak, quality group did not affect consumer sensory ratings of retail and foodservice steaks. Average postfabrication aging times were 32 d for foodservice subprimals and 19 d for retail cut subprimals. These data indicate that improvements in the tenderness of retail cuts from the round are needed. Finally, quality group had little or no effect on consumer sensory evaluations and WBS values of retail and foodservice steaks used in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10907827     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7871852x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Effect of carcass fat and conformation class on consumer perception of various grilled beef muscles.

Authors:  Dominika Guzek; Dominika Głąbska; Krystyna Gutkowska; Agnieszka Wierzbicka
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Palatability of beef chuck, loin, and round muscles from three USDA quality grades.

Authors:  Kara M Nyquist; Travis G O'Quinn; Lindsey N Drey; Loni W Lucherk; J C Brooks; Mark F Miller; Jerrad F Legako
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Wet bone-in ageing and effect on beef quality technological parameters.

Authors:  Francesca Crivelli; Erica Tirloni; Cristian Bernardi; Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi; Simone Stella
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  United States beef quality as chronicled by the National Beef Quality Audits, Beef Consumer Satisfaction Projects, and National Beef Tenderness Surveys - A review.

Authors:  John Michael Gonzalez; Kelsey Jean Phelps
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Beef from Calves Finished with a Diet Based on Concentrate Rich in Agro-Industrial By-Products: Acceptability and Quality Label Preferences in Spanish Meat Consumers.

Authors:  Elena Angón; Francisco Requena; Javier Caballero-Villalobos; Miguel Cantarero-Aparicio; Andrés Luís Martínez-Marín; José Manuel Perea
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Evaluation of beef in purified sea water: microbiological and chemical-physical aspects.

Authors:  Simone Stella; Cristian Bernardi; Davide Timaco; Erica Tirloni
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2022-02-22

7.  Influence of Grain- and Grass-Finishing Systems on Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Consumer Sensory Attributes of Bison.

Authors:  Jessica Janssen; Kristi Cammack; Jerrad Legako; Ryan Cox; J Kyle Grubbs; Keith Underwood; John Hansen; Carter Kruse; Amanda Blair
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  Effect of Aging Time on Physicochemical Meat Quality and Sensory Property of Hanwoo Bull Beef.

Authors:  Soohyun Cho; Sun Moon Kang; Pilnam Seong; Geunho Kang; Yunseok Kim; Jinhyung Kim; Seounghwan Lee; Sidong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect.

Authors:  Brigitte Picard; Mohammed Gagaoua; Marwa Al-Jammas; Leanne De Koning; Albéric Valais; Muriel Bonnet
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review.

Authors:  Rhonda Miller
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.