Literature DB >> 10907100

The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus.

R W Clement1, J Krueger.   

Abstract

People's own responses to a social stimulus (i.e. whether they endorse it or reject it) predict how they expect other people to respond (consensus estimates). This correlation has long been accepted as evidence for social projection. There has been little direct evidence, however, for the assumption that self-referent judgments shape judgments about others. Supporting the projection model, Expt 1 shows that self-referent information is more accessible than consensus estimates. Once they have been made, people's own endorsements and rejections of a stimulus facilitate consensus estimates. In turn, consensus estimates facilitate endorsements (but less so). Judgments about the physical properties of the stimulus facilitate neither type of social judgment. Supporting the view that projection is egocentric, Expt 2 shows that, when making consensus estimates, people rely more on their own endorsements than on the endorsements made by another individual. This self-other difference does not depend on whose endorsements are revealed first or on whether the other person is anonymous or individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10907100     DOI: 10.1348/014466600164471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  5 in total

1.  Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance Hypothesis.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; James M Olson
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

2.  Individual Attitudes toward Deviant Behavior and Perceived Attitudes of Friends: Self-stereotyping and Social Projection in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Daniel Seddig
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2019-09-16

3.  Is social projection based on simulation or theory? Why new methods are needed for differentiating.

Authors:  Claudia Bazinger; Anton Kühberger
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2012-12

4.  Prior preferences beneficially influence social and non-social learning.

Authors:  Tor Tarantola; Dharshan Kumaran; Peter Dayan; Benedetto De Martino
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Utility and use of accuracy cues in social learning of crowd preferences.

Authors:  Jaeseob Lim; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.