Literature DB >> 10906317

Maintaining and shifting attention within left or right hemifield.

R Vandenberghe1, J Duncan, K M Arnell, S J Bishop, N J Herrod, A M Owen, P S Minhas, P Dupont, J D Pickard, G A Orban.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to examine two questions: (i) which structures of the intact human brain change their activity with the direction of attention to left or right visual field; and (ii) how does activity in these structures, and in parietal cortex in particular, depend on the frequency of attentional shifts? Subjects were required to discriminate the orientation of peripheral gratings. The two main experimental variables were the attended hemifield (left or right) and the proportion of trials requiring a shift within that hemifield (20% or 80%). A detection control condition was also included. Behaviourally, subjects were less accurate and significantly slower when a trial required a shift than when it did not. Ventral and lateral occipital areas showed significantly higher blood flow levels contralateral to the direction of attention. Replicating previous work, there was also a significant main effect of the direction of attention in left lateral prefrontal cortex: blood flow levels were higher during leftward attention in comparison both to baseline and to rightward attention. This left frontal effect reached significance in single subjects in whom several activation sites could be distinguished within left middle and inferior frontal gyrus. Right and left parietal cortex were activated during both left- and right-field attention conditions, with a tendency for higher activity levels when attention was directed contralaterally. Contrary to the experimental hypothesis, however, parietal regions were not activated differentially by high versus low numbers of attentional shifts. The current experiment confirms that left frontal convexity is sensitive to manipulations of the direction of visuospatial attention. The results do not indicate a specific role of parietal cortex in attentional shifting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10906317     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.7.706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  11 in total

1.  Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex.

Authors:  M F Rushworth; T Paus; P K Sipila
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dynamic activation of frontal, parietal, and sensory regions underlying anticipatory visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Gregory V Simpson; Darren L Weber; Corby L Dale; Dimitrios Pantazis; Steven L Bressler; Richard M Leahy; Tracy L Luks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Prioritizing new over old: an fMRI study of the preview search task.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stephen Smith; Paul Matthews; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Human brain regions involved in heading estimation.

Authors:  H Peuskens; S Sunaert; P Dupont; P Van Hecke; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mechanisms of spatial attention control in frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Christina S Konen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Differential visually-induced gamma-oscillations in human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Eishi Asano; Masaaki Nishida; Miho Fukuda; Robert Rothermel; Csaba Juhász; Sandeep Sood
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Can structural MRI indices of cerebral integrity track cognitive trends in executive control function during normal maturation and adulthood?

Authors:  Peter Kochunov; Don A Robin; Don R Royall; Thomas Coyle; Jack Lancaster; Valeria Kochunov; Anita E Schlosser; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Neural correlates of perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma in humans.

Authors:  R S Weil; J M Kilner; J D Haynes; G Rees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks.

Authors:  Metehan Ciçek; Leon Y Deouell; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.