Literature DB >> 10906303

Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

J S Lindholt1, S Vammen, H Fasting, E W Henneberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the potential psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
METHODS: The participants were prospectively and randomly sampled from a randomised screening trial for AAA and asked to complete a validated generic and global anonymous quality of life (QL) questionnaire by self-assessment (ScreenQL). Material case-control study: ScreenQL was completed once by 168 (48%) of 350 non-responders to screening, 271 (81%) of 335 attenders before screening, 286 (85%) of 335 attenders after screening, 127 (85%) of 149 with a small AAA diagnosed at screening, and 231 (66%) of 350 who were randomised not to be offered screening for AAA (controls). Prospective study (paired data): 127 men having a small AAA diagnosed. Twenty-nine (81%) of 36 men operated after initial conservative treatment.
RESULTS: Initially, the QL score was 5% lower among men with a small AAA compared to the controls (p<0.05), mainly because of poorer health perception. The QL score declined significantly further to 7% below control values during the period of conservative treatment. This impairment was mainly due to a 21% and 15% reduction in scores relating to health perception and psychosomatic distress, respectively. However, all scores improved to control levels in patients operated on. The QL of attending men for screening was significantly lower than that of the controls and the attenders after the screening. No differences were noticed concerning the non-attenders.
CONCLUSION: The offer of screening causes transient psychological stress in subjects found not to have AAA. However, diagnosis of an AAA seems to impair QL permanently and progressively in conservatively treated cases. This impairment seems reversible by operation. Nevertheless, the impairment seems considerable, and must be considered in the management of AAA and in the final evaluation of screening for AAA. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10906303     DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  15 in total

1.  Vascular ultrasound screening for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Joanne Thanos; Mayvis Rebeira; B William Shragge; David Urbach
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11

2.  Association of Life's Simple 7 with reduced clinically manifest abdominal aortic aneurysm: The ARIC study.

Authors:  Abayomi O Oyenuga; Aaron R Folsom; Pamela L Lutsey; Weihong Tang
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Recommendations on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sourabh Aggarwal; Arman Qamar; Vishal Sharma; Alka Sharma
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011

5.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jes S Lindholt; Svend Juul; Helge Fasting; Eskild W Henneberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-09

6.  Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-01-01

7.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men: a Canadian perspective using Monte Carlo-based estimates.

Authors:  Bernard Montreuil; James Brophy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Long-term MRA follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms: impact on mood and anxiety.

Authors:  Sandra P Ferns; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Willem Jan J van Rooij; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Charles B L M Majoie
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruth E Collins; Laureen M Lopez; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Cost effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and rescreening in men in a modern context: evaluation of a hypothetical cohort using a decision analytical model.

Authors:  Rikke Søgaard; Jesper Laustsen; Jes S Lindholt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.