M J Schull1, D A Redelmeier. 1. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. mjs@ices.on.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefit of routine electrocardiographic (ECG) telemetry monitoring on in-hospital cardiac arrest survival. METHODS: In a tertiary care hospital, all telemetry ward admissions and cardiac arrests occurring over a five-year period were reviewed. Ward location and survival to discharge were determined for all patients outside of critical care areas. RESULTS: During the study period, 8,932 patients were admitted to the telemetry ward, and 20 suffered cardiac arrest (0.2%; 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.3). Telemetry monitors signaled the onset of cardiac arrest in only 56% (95% CI = 30 to 80) of monitored arrests. Three patients survived to discharge, and in two of these three patients the arrest onset was signaled by the monitor. This yields a monitor-signaled survival rate among telemetry ward patients of 0.02% (95% CI = 0 to 0.05). All survivors suffered significant arrhythmias prior to their cardiac arrests. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac arrest is an uncommon event among telemetry ward patients, and monitor-signaled survivors are extremely rare. Routine telemetry offers little cardiac arrest survival benefit to most monitored patients, and a more selective policy for telemetry use might safely avoid ECG monitoring for many patients.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefit of routine electrocardiographic (ECG) telemetry monitoring on in-hospital cardiac arrest survival. METHODS: In a tertiary care hospital, all telemetry ward admissions and cardiac arrests occurring over a five-year period were reviewed. Ward location and survival to discharge were determined for all patients outside of critical care areas. RESULTS: During the study period, 8,932 patients were admitted to the telemetry ward, and 20 suffered cardiac arrest (0.2%; 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.3). Telemetry monitors signaled the onset of cardiac arrest in only 56% (95% CI = 30 to 80) of monitored arrests. Three patients survived to discharge, and in two of these three patients the arrest onset was signaled by the monitor. This yields a monitor-signaled survival rate among telemetry ward patients of 0.02% (95% CI = 0 to 0.05). All survivors suffered significant arrhythmias prior to their cardiac arrests. CONCLUSIONS:Cardiac arrest is an uncommon event among telemetry ward patients, and monitor-signaled survivors are extremely rare. Routine telemetry offers little cardiac arrest survival benefit to most monitored patients, and a more selective policy for telemetry use might safely avoid ECG monitoring for many patients.
Authors: Shamai A Grossman; Nathan I Shapiro; J Lawrence Mottley; Leon Sanchez; Edward Ullman; Richard E Wolfe Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Jonathan S Steinberg; Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Peter Aziz; Paweł Balsam; Adrian Baranchuk; Daniel J Cantillon; Polychronis Dilaveris; Sergio J Dubner; Nabil El-Sherif; Jaroslaw Krol; Malgorzata Kurpesa; Maria Teresa La Rovere; Suave S Lobodzinski; Emanuela T Locati; Suneet Mittal; Brian Olshansky; Ewa Piotrowicz; Leslie Saxon; Peter H Stone; Larisa Tereshchenko; Mintu P Turakhia; Gioia Turitto; Neil J Wimmer; Richard L Verrier; Wojciech Zareba; Ryszard Piotrowicz Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Pranav Kansara; Kristi Jackson; Robert Dressler; Henry Weiner; Roger Kerzner; William S Weintraub; Andrew Doorey Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Sandeep K Dhillon; Baruch Goldstein; Dayana Eslava-Manchego; Jagdeep Singh; Sam Hanon; Paul Schweitzer; Steven R Bergmann Journal: Cardiol Res Date: 2012-01-20
Authors: Sarah Chuzi; Eric P Cantey; Erin Unger; James E Rosenthal; Aashish Didwania; William C McGaghie; Stuart Prenner Journal: MedEdPORTAL Date: 2018-07-13
Authors: Daniel J Cantillon; Alicia Burkle; Desiree Kirkwood; Molly Loy; Ram Amuthan; Shannon Pengel; John Tote; William Morris; Penny L Houghtaling; Aaron C Hamilton; Marc Petre; Umesh N Khot; Bruce D Lindsay Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 2.882