Literature DB >> 10905643

Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and cardiac arrest outcomes in 8,932 telemetry ward patients.

M J Schull1, D A Redelmeier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefit of routine electrocardiographic (ECG) telemetry monitoring on in-hospital cardiac arrest survival.
METHODS: In a tertiary care hospital, all telemetry ward admissions and cardiac arrests occurring over a five-year period were reviewed. Ward location and survival to discharge were determined for all patients outside of critical care areas.
RESULTS: During the study period, 8,932 patients were admitted to the telemetry ward, and 20 suffered cardiac arrest (0.2%; 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.3). Telemetry monitors signaled the onset of cardiac arrest in only 56% (95% CI = 30 to 80) of monitored arrests. Three patients survived to discharge, and in two of these three patients the arrest onset was signaled by the monitor. This yields a monitor-signaled survival rate among telemetry ward patients of 0.02% (95% CI = 0 to 0.05). All survivors suffered significant arrhythmias prior to their cardiac arrests.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac arrest is an uncommon event among telemetry ward patients, and monitor-signaled survivors are extremely rare. Routine telemetry offers little cardiac arrest survival benefit to most monitored patients, and a more selective policy for telemetry use might safely avoid ECG monitoring for many patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10905643     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02038.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  11 in total

1.  Is telemetry useful in evaluating chest pain patients in an observation unit?

Authors:  Shamai A Grossman; Nathan I Shapiro; J Lawrence Mottley; Leon Sanchez; Edward Ullman; Richard E Wolfe
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry.

Authors:  Jonathan S Steinberg; Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Peter Aziz; Paweł Balsam; Adrian Baranchuk; Daniel J Cantillon; Polychronis Dilaveris; Sergio J Dubner; Nabil El-Sherif; Jaroslaw Krol; Malgorzata Kurpesa; Maria Teresa La Rovere; Suave S Lobodzinski; Emanuela T Locati; Suneet Mittal; Brian Olshansky; Ewa Piotrowicz; Leslie Saxon; Peter H Stone; Larisa Tereshchenko; Mintu P Turakhia; Gioia Turitto; Neil J Wimmer; Richard L Verrier; Wojciech Zareba; Ryszard Piotrowicz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Potential of Missing Life-Threatening Arrhythmias After Limiting the Use of Cardiac Telemetry.

Authors:  Pranav Kansara; Kristi Jackson; Robert Dressler; Henry Weiner; Roger Kerzner; William S Weintraub; Andrew Doorey
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Michael J Ward; Mark H Eckman; Daniel P Schauer; Ali S Raja; Sean Collins
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Over-monitoring and alarm fatigue: for whom do the bells toll?

Authors:  Shelli Feder; Marjorie Funk
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.210

6.  Effectiveness of Telemetry Guidelines in Predicting Clinically Significant Arrhythmias in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Sandeep K Dhillon; Baruch Goldstein; Dayana Eslava-Manchego; Jagdeep Singh; Sam Hanon; Paul Schweitzer; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2012-01-20

7.  Interactive Multimodal Curriculum on Use and Interpretation of Inpatient Telemetry.

Authors:  Sarah Chuzi; Eric P Cantey; Erin Unger; James E Rosenthal; Aashish Didwania; William C McGaghie; Stuart Prenner
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2018-07-13

8.  Indication-specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel J Cantillon; Alicia Burkle; Desiree Kirkwood; Molly Loy; Ram Amuthan; Shannon Pengel; John Tote; William Morris; Penny L Houghtaling; Aaron C Hamilton; Marc Petre; Umesh N Khot; Bruce D Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Feasibility and Usability of Patch-based Continuous Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in Comparison with Traditional Telemetry in Noncritically Ill Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Ram Amuthan; Alicia Burkle; Steven Mould; John Tote; Molly Loy; Desiree Kirkwood; Josalyn Meyer; Shannon Pengel; Aaron C Hamilton; Daniel J Cantillon
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-09-15

10.  Utilization of Continuous Cardiac Monitoring on Hospitalist-led Teaching Teams.

Authors:  Debbie W Chen; Robert Park; Sarah Young; Divya Chalikonda; Kemarut Laothamatas; Gretchen Diemer
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.