Literature DB >> 10904012

Performance of classic electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in an African population.

C Jaggy1, F Perret, P Bovet, G van Melle, N Zerkiebel, G Madeleine, L Kappenberger, F Paccaud.   

Abstract

ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have been almost exclusively elaborated and calibrated in white populations. Because several interethnic differences in ECG characteristics have been found, the applicability of these criteria to African individuals remains to be demonstrated. We therefore investigated the performance of classic ECG criteria for LVH detection in an African population. Digitized 12-lead ECG tracings were obtained from 334 African individuals randomly selected from the general population of the Republic of Seychelles (Indian Ocean). Left ventricular mass was calculated with M-mode echocardiography and indexed to body height. LVH was defined by taking the 95th percentile of body height-indexed LVM values in a reference subgroup. In the entire study sample, 16 men and 15 women (prevalence 9.3%) were finally declared to have LVH, of whom 9 were of the reference subgroup. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for LVH were calculated for 9 classic ECG criteria, and receiver operating characteristic curves were computed. We also generated a new composite time-voltage criterion with stepwise multiple linear regression: weighted time-voltage criterion=(0.2366R(aVL)+0.0551R(V5)+0.0785S(V3)+ 0.2993T(V1))xQRS duration. The Sokolow-Lyon criterion reached the highest sensitivity (61%) and the R(aVL) voltage criterion reached the highest specificity (97%) when evaluated at their traditional partition value. However, at a fixed specificity of 95%, the sensitivity of these 10 criteria ranged from 16% to 32%. Best accuracy was obtained with the R(aVL) voltage criterion and the new composite time-voltage criterion (89% for both). Positive and negative predictive values varied considerably depending on the concomitant presence of 3 clinical risk factors for LVH (hypertension, age >/=50 years, overweight). Median positive and negative predictive values of the 10 ECG criteria were 15% and 95%, respectively, for subjects with none or 1 of these risk factors compared with 63% and 76% for subjects with all of them. In conclusion, the performance of classic ECG criteria for LVH detection was largely disparate and appeared to be lower in this population of East African origin than in white subjects. A newly generated composite time-voltage criterion might provide improved performance. The predictive value of ECG criteria for LVH was considerably enhanced with the integration of information on concomitant clinical risk factors for LVH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10904012     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.36.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  7 in total

1.  Left ventricular hypertrophy detection from simple clinical measures combined with electrocardiographic criteria in a group of African ancestry.

Authors:  Fabian Maunganidze; Angela J Woodiwiss; Carlos D Libhaber; Muzi J Maseko; Olebogeng H I Majane; Gavin R Norton
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy as compared with cardiac computed tomography: from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography trial.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Leon M Ptaszek; Elizabeth M Charipar; Carolyn Taylor; Joao D Fontes; Matthias Kriegel; Thomas Irlbeck; Michael Toepker; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Ron Blankstein; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Seamens' Sign: a novel electrocardiogram prediction tool for left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Philip Walker; Cathy A Jenkins; Jeremy Hatcher; Clifford Freeman; Nickolas Srica; Bryant Rosell; Eriny Hanna; Cooper March; Charles Seamens; Alan Storrow; Nicole McCoin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the Prediction of Stroke in the Elderly.

Authors:  Wesley T O'Neal; Mohamed F Almahmoud; Waqas T Qureshi; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Prevalence and associated factors of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in a rural community, central Thailand.

Authors:  Patipan Viwatrangkul; Sakda Lawanwisut; Pondfah Leekhaphan; Tatchamon Prasart-Intara; Pathomphon Phiensuparp; Sirapat Prakiatpongsa; Promnavaporn Amnaj; Vichaya Phoominart; Krittanan Chanyou; Peeratuth Jiratrakan; Pisit Klumnaimueang; Nattapat Pipitdaecha; Rawin Panchamawat; Pannathorn Tangkongpanich; Mathirut Mungthin; Ram Rangsin; Boonsub Sakboonyarat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prevalence of major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and their relationship with cardiovascular risk factors in Angolans.

Authors:  Mauer A A Gonçalves; João Mário Pedro; Carina Silva; Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Brito
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-02-09

7.  Prevalence and covariates of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in diabetic patients in Tanzania.

Authors:  J J K Lutale; H Thordarson; Z Gulam-Abbas; K Vetvik; E Gerdts
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.