Literature DB >> 10903883

Sensitivity of MRI to proteoglycan depletion in cartilage: comparison of sodium and proton MRI.

A Borthakur1, E M Shapiro, J Beers, S Kudchodkar, J B Kneeland, R Reddy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the results from sodium and proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting small changes in proteoglycan (PG) content in bovine articular cartilage specimens.
DESIGN: Articular cartilage from 15 specimens of bovine patellae were subjected to partial PG depletion with different concentrations of trypsin for 30 min. Sodium and proton MR images of the intact specimen were obtained on a 4T GE clinical MRI system. Two custom-built 7 cm-diameter solenoid coils tuned to proton and sodium frequencies were employed. Fast gradient echo and spin echo imaging sequences were used to determine sodium density, proton density and proton relaxation times (T(1)and T(2)) of the specimens. Spectrophotometric assay was performed after MRI to determine PG concentrations of the cartilage specimens.
RESULTS: The sodium signal change correlated well with the observed PG loss (R(2)=0.85, P< 0.01) whereas the proton signal change was inconsistent (R(2)=0.10, P< 0.8). The change in proton T(1)and T(2)between the two regions did not correlate with PG loss (R(2)=0. 07 and R(2)=0.06, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Results from these studies demonstrate that sodium MRI is both sensitive and specific in detecting small changes in PG concentration, whereas proton density and relaxation properties are not sensitive to small changes in PG content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10903883     DOI: 10.1053/joca.1999.0303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  64 in total

1.  Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

3.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the assessment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Chenyang Wang; Joshua D Auerbach; Walter R T Witschey; Richard A Balderston; Ravinder Reddy; Arijit Borthakur
Journal:  Semin Spine Surg       Date:  2007-06

Review 4.  Measurement techniques for magnetic resonance imaging of fast relaxing nuclei.

Authors:  Simon Konstandin; Armin M Nagel
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  23Na MRI accurately measures fixed charge density in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Erik M Shapiro; Arijitt Borthakur; Alexander Gougoutas; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Clean demarcation of cartilage tissue 23Na by inversion recovery.

Authors:  Peng Rong; Ravinder R Regatte; Alexej Jerschow
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  In vitro degradation of articular cartilage: does trypsin treatment produce consistent results?

Authors:  H R Moody; C P Brown; J C Bowden; R W Crawford; D L S McElwain; A O Oloyede
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Sodium and T1rho MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Arijitt Borthakur; Eric Mellon; Sampreet Niyogi; Walter Witschey; J Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Novel contrast mechanisms at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Optical coherence tomography grading correlates with MRI T2 mapping and extracellular matrix content.

Authors:  David M Bear; Ashley Williams; Charleen T Chu; Christian H Coyle; Constance R Chu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.