Literature DB >> 10903683

Midface anomalies in children.

L H Lowe1, T N Booth, J M Joglar, N K Rollins.   

Abstract

A variety of congenital midface anomalies occur in children. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have proved helpful in determining the nature and extent of dysplasia, thereby facilitating treatment planning. A classification system has been developed that groups these anomalies into four categories based on embryogenesis and anatomic location. These categories comprise anomalies that are related to the nasal cavity, nasofrontal region, nasolacrimal apparatus, and craniofacial syndromes. CT is the imaging modality of choice in children with possible choanal atresia, pyriform aperture stenosis, or anomalies of the nasolacrimal duct (eg, nasolacrimal duct stenosis, dacryocystoceles). MR imaging is the modality of choice in patients with congenital midface masses (eg, dermoid and epidermoid cysts, nasal gliomas, encephaloceles) and craniofacial syndromes (eg, Apert syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, Treacher Collins syndrome). In many cases, however, both CT and MR imaging are required to adequately evaluate midface anomalies. Familiarity with the characteristic imaging features of these anomalies along with knowledge of midface embryogenesis and normal developmental anatomy is essential to prevent misinterpretation of anatomic variations that may simulate disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10903683     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl07907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  22 in total

1.  Rare combination of frontonasal and bilateral naso-orbital encephaloceles.

Authors:  Alan A Alexander; Megan R Saettele; Daniel L'heureux; Paras A Shah; Kristin A Fickenscher
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis: first case report in oman.

Authors:  Rashid Al Abri; Hashim Javad; Sudesh Kumar; Deepa Bharga; Rl Koul; Amna Al Futaisi; Dilip Sankla
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-07

Review 3.  Congenital midline nasofrontal masses.

Authors:  Megan Saettele; Alan Alexander; Brian Markovich; John Morelli; Lisa H Lowe
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-05-22

4.  Neonatal nasal obstruction caused by bilateral dacryocystoceles.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Tsai; Jon-Kway Huang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09-12

5.  Morphogenesis of the human excretory lacrimal system.

Authors:  C de la Cuadra-Blanco; M D Peces-Peña; L Jáñez-Escalada; J R Mérida-Velasco
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Diagnostic imaging features of congenital nose and nasal cavity lesions.

Authors:  D T Ginat; C D Robson
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 7.  Syndromes of the first and second branchial arches, part 2: syndromes.

Authors:  J M Johnson; G Moonis; G E Green; R Carmody; H N Burbank
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Midline Craniofacial Masses in Children.

Authors:  Renae D Van Wyhe; Edward S Chamata; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 9.  Choanal Atresia and Craniosynostosis: Development and Disease.

Authors:  Kate M Lesciotto; Yann Heuzé; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joseph M Bernstein; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis: clinical and radiologic findings and treatment.

Authors:  Bekir Sanal; Nevzat Demirhan; Mustafa Koplay; Mustafa Yurtkuran Sadikoğlu; Arif Gürpinar
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.