Literature DB >> 10903583

Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.

C M Petersen1, R D Johnson, D Schuit.   

Abstract

Cervical range of motion (ROM) is evaluated in both clinical and research settings. This study's purpose was to determine if ROM data obtained with the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyser (SMA) from asymptomatic and symptomatic cervical subjects were reliable within and between testers. Cervical ROM was measured in all three planes in 30 adult asymptomatic and 20 adult symptomatic subjects. A standardized protocol was used to fit each subject with the OSI SMA cervical hardware. Subjects were tested in a seated position with the trunk stabilized. Subjects performed four trials of each pain-free cervical motion during testing. The hardware was completely removed and replaced by the same tester and ROM trials in all three planes were repeated for intratester asymptomatic and symptomatic reliability. The same procedure was completed by a second tester for asymptomatic intratester and intertester reliability. Repeated measures analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [2,1 and 2 k]) were used to analyse intra- and intertester reliability data. Intratester ICCs were 0.85 or higher (except for flexion 0.76) for asymptomatic subjects and 0. 87 or higher (except for flexion 0.68) for symptomatic subjects for all motions. Intertester ICCs were 0.88 or higher for all motions. Standard error of measurements were less than 3.92 degrees for all motions. Measures of cervical spinal ROM obtained with the OSI SMA showed good intertester reliablity for all motions, and good intratester reliability for all motions with the exception of the motion of flexion for one of the examiners, which showed moderate reliability. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10903583     DOI: 10.1054/math.2000.0232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools.

Authors:  Victoria Misailidou; Paraskevi Malliou; Anastasia Beneka; Alexandros Karagiannidis; Georgios Godolias
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-06

2.  Instantaneous helical axis methodology to identify aberrant neck motion.

Authors:  Arin M Ellingson; Vishal Yelisetti; Craig A Schulz; Gert Bronfort; Joseph Downing; Daniel F Keefe; David J Nuckley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chantal H P de Koning; Sylvia P van den Heuvel; J Bart Staal; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Erik J M Hendriks
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  An Inexpensive and Easy to Use Cervical Range of Motion Measurement Solution Using Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Rafael Raya; Rodrigo Garcia-Carmona; Cristina Sanchez; Eloy Urendes; Oscar Ramirez; Alvaro Martin; Abraham Otero
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Experimental assessment of cervical ranges of motion and compensatory strategies.

Authors:  Céline Niewiadomski; Rohan-Jean Bianco; Sanae Afquir; Morgane Evin; Pierre-Jean Arnoux
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.