Literature DB >> 10902887

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors.

K Ebe1, M J Griffin.   

Abstract

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m x s(-2) rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902887     DOI: 10.1080/001401300404742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

1.  The combined fatigue effects of sequential exposure to seated whole body vibration and physical, mental, or concurrent work demands.

Authors:  Marcus Yung; Angelica E Lang; Jamie Stobart; Aaron M Kociolek; Stephan Milosavljevic; Catherine Trask
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mechanical Predictors of Discomfort during Load Carriage.

Authors:  Patrick D Wettenschwiler; Silvio Lorenzetti; Rolf Stämpfli; René M Rossi; Stephen J Ferguson; Simon Annaheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.