Literature DB >> 10902881

Text entry on handheld computers by older users.

P Wright1, C Bartram, N Rogers, H Emslie, J Evans, B Wilson, S Belt.   

Abstract

Small pocket computers offer great potential in workplaces where mobility is needed to collect data or access reference information while carrying out tasks such as maintenance or customer support. This paper reports on three studies examining the hypothesis that data entry by older workers is easier when the pocket computer has a physical keyboard, albeit a small one, rather than a touch-screen keyboard. Using a counter-balanced, within-subjects design the accuracy and speed with which adults over 55 years of age could make or modify short text entries was measured for both kinds of pocket computer. The keyboard computer was the Hewlett Packard 360LX (HP), but the touch-screen computers varied across studies (experiment 1: Apple Newton and PalmPilot; experiment 2: Philips Nino; experiment 3: Casio E10). All studies showed significant decrements in accuracy and speed when entering text via the touch-screen. Across studies, most participants preferred using the HP's small physical keyboard. Even after additional practice with the touch screen (experiments 2 and 3) many entries still contained errors. Experiment 3 showed that younger people were faster but not more accurate than older people at using the touch-screen keyboard. It is concluded that satisfactory text entry on palm-size computers awaits improvements to the touch-screen keyboard or alternative input methods such as handwriting or voice. Interface developments that assist older people typically benefit younger users too.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902881     DOI: 10.1080/001401300404689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

Review 1.  Handheld computing in medicine.

Authors:  Sandra Fischer; Thomas E Stewart; Sangeeta Mehta; Randy Wax; Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Organizational and physician perspectives about facilitating handheld computer use in clinical practice: results of a cross-site qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Sharon B Schweikhart; Mitchell A Medow
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial.

Authors:  Guy Haller; Dagmar M Haller; Delphine S Courvoisier; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  PDA support for outpatient clinical clerkships: mobile computing for medical education.

Authors:  S Speedie; J Pacala; G Vercellotti; I Harris; X Zhou
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

5.  Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Sharon B Schweikhart; Mitchell A Medow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

Review 6.  Telepsychiatry: an overview for psychiatrists.

Authors:  Donald M Hilty; John S Luo; Chris Morache; Divine A Marcelo; Thomas S Nesbitt
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  iPad-assisted measurements of duration estimation in psychiatric patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  Irene Preuschoff; Helge H Müller; Wolfgang Sperling; Teresa Biermann; Matthias Bergner; Johannes Kornhuber; Teja W Groemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of electronic data capture (EDC) with the standard data capture method for clinical trial data.

Authors:  Brigitte Walther; Safayet Hossin; John Townend; Neil Abernethy; David Parker; David Jeffries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development and evaluation of a hand held computer based on-call pack for health protection out of hours duty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abubakar; Christopher J Williams; Marian McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.