Literature DB >> 10902555

The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose.

M R Arnfield1, C H Siantar, J Siebers, P Garmon, L Cox, R Mohan.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the accuracy of dose predicted by a Batho power law correction, and two models which account for electron range: A superposition/convolution algorithm and a Monte Carlo algorithm. The results of these models were compared in phantoms with cavities and low-density inhomogeneities. An idealized geometry was considered with inhomogeneities represented by regions of air and lung equivalent material. Measurements were performed with a parallel plate ionization chamber, thin TLDs (thermoluminescent dosimeters) and film. Dose calculations were done with a generalized Batho model, the Pinnacle collapsed cone convolution model (CCC), and the Peregrine Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. Absolute central axis and off axis dose data at various depths relative to interfaces of inhomogeneities were compared. Our results confirm that for a Batho correction, dose errors in the calculated depth dose arise from the neglect of electron transport. This effect increases as the field size decreases, as the density of the inhomogeneity decreases, and with the energy of incident photons. The CCC calculations were closer to measurements than the Batho model, but significant discrepancies remain. Monte Carlo results agree with measurements within the measurement and computational uncertainties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902555     DOI: 10.1118/1.599004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

1.  Monte Carlo dose calculations for a 6-MV photon beam in a thorax phantom.

Authors:  Alireza Farajollahi; Asghar Mesbahi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-05

2.  A convolution/superposition method using primary and scatter dose kernels formed for energy bins of X-ray spectra reconstructed as a function of off-axis distance: comparison of calculated and measured 10-MV X-ray doses in thorax-like phantoms.

Authors:  Shigenobu Kimura; Kohji Sutoh; Kazuo Kamimura; Akira Iwasaki; Makoto Sasamori; Fumio Komai; Morio Seino; Singo Terashima; Mamoru Kubota; Junichi Hirota; Yoichiro Hosokawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-06-22

Review 3.  Monte Carlo systems used for treatment planning and dose verification.

Authors:  Lorenzo Brualla; Miguel Rodriguez; Antonio M Lallena
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  A measurement-based generalized source model for Monte Carlo dose simulations of CT scans.

Authors:  Xin Ming; Yuanming Feng; Ransheng Liu; Chengwen Yang; Li Zhou; Hezheng Zhai; Jun Deng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.

Authors:  Ryan Neph; Cheng Ouyang; John Neylon; Youming Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Feasibility of a multigroup deterministic solution method for three-dimensional radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Oleg N Vassiliev; Todd A Wareing; Ian M Davis; John McGhee; Douglas Barnett; John L Horton; Kent Gifford; Gregory Failla; Uwe Titt; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters.

Authors:  Antonella Bufacchi; Barbara Nardiello; Roberto Capparella; Luisa Begnozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Ivaylo Mihaylov; Yan Wu; Paul J Keall; Jeffrey V Siebers; Michael P Hagan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam based optimization of stereotactic lung IMRT.

Authors:  Marcin Sikora; Jan Muzik; Matthias Söhn; Martin Weinmann; Markus Alber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Modeling and dosimetric performance evaluation of the RayStation treatment planning system.

Authors:  Bongile Mzenda; Koki V Mugabe; Rick Sims; Guy Godwin; Dayan Loria
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.