Literature DB >> 10902550

Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.

G X Ding1, J E Cygler, C B Kwok.   

Abstract

We compare the results of absorbed dose determined at reference conditions according to the AAPM TG-21 dose calibration protocol and the new AAPM TG-51 protocol. The AAPM TG-21 protocol for absorbed dose calibration is based on ionization chambers having exposure calibration factors for 60Co gamma rays, N(x). The new AAPM TG-51 dosimetry protocol for absorbed dose calibration is based on ionization chambers having 60Co absorbed dose-to-water calibration factor, N60Co(D,w). This study shows that the dose changes are within 1% for a cobalt beam, 0.5% for photon energies of 6 and 18 MV, and 2%-3% for electron beams with energies of 6 to 20 MeV. The chamber primary calibration factors, Nx and N60Co(D,w), are traceable to the Canadian primary standards laboratory (NRCC). We also present estimated dose changes between the two protocols when calibration factors are traceable to NIST in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902550     DOI: 10.1118/1.598999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm McEwen; Larry DeWerd; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill; David W O Rogers; Stephen Seltzer; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Extrapolation chamber mounted on perspex for calibration of high energy photon and electron beams from a clinical linear accelerator.

Authors:  R Ravichandran; J P Binukumar; S S Sivakumar; K Krishnamurthy; C A Davis
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-01

3.  Modified electron beam output calibration based on IAEA Technical Report Series 398.

Authors:  Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro; Dwi Aprilia Mahfirotin; Muhamad Iqbal Assegab; Wahyu Edy Wibowo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51.

Authors:  David S Followill; William F Hanson; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Leon R Eglezopoulos; Chen-Shou Chui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.