Literature DB >> 10901600

Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years.

S A Lundin1, G Koch.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare and evaluate Class I- and Class II-restorations performed in two different composite posterior materials after 5 and 10 years. Both materials were introduced in 1983 and adapted to stress-bearing restorations. The only difference between the two materials was that one contained barium-aluminium silicate, which made the material radiopaque. All 137 restorations were performed according to standardized clinical procedures by two experienced clinicians and placed in premolars (59) or molars (78). Forty-five of the restorations were Class I and 92 Class II. The restorations were followed for the first 5 years according to the U. S. Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria. After 10 years an evaluation based on the documentation sent in by the patient's present dentist was made. Of the original 137 restorations, 127 could be examined after 5 years and 117 after 10 years. The evaluation showed that after 5 years, 114 of the examined restorations were in clinical function and after 10 years 92, which means 90 and 79 per cent respectively, of the restorations evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10901600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swed Dent J        ISSN: 0347-9994


  5 in total

1.  Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.

Authors:  Juergen Manhart; Hong-Yan Chen; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N J M Opdam; F H van de Sande; E Bronkhorst; M S Cenci; P Bottenberg; U Pallesen; P Gaengler; A Lindberg; M C D N J M Huysmans; J W van Dijken
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results.

Authors:  L G Lopes; D F G Cefaly; E B Franco; R F L Mondelli; J R P Lauris; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth.

Authors:  A Brunthaler; F König; T Lucas; W Sperr; A Schedle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.