Literature DB >> 10900957

[Determining the size of the specific surface of bone substitutes with gas adsorption].

G Weibrich1, R Trettin, S H Gnoth, H Götz, H Duschner, W Wagner.   

Abstract

The surface area and the microporosity of bone regeneration materials influence their chemical and biological properties. Therefore, the size of the specific surface area and the distribution of the pore diameters (pores < 1 micron) of bone regeneration materials were analyzed within this study. The analyzed hydroxyapatites were of synthetic, bovine, and phytotroph origin. The tricalcium phosphates and the bioglasses included only synthetic materials. The gas adsorption of each specimen was analyzed using a volumetric N2/Kr system (ASAP 2010, Micromeritics). Additionally, for materials with a specific surface area (> 2 m2/g) the pore size distribution was evaluated by the BJH-method. Two of the materials evaluated astonishingly large dimensions of the specific surface area (BioOss 79.7 m2/g, Algipore new 14.6 m2/g). A medium surface area was found for Algipore old (4.9 m2/g) and Interpore200 (2.64 m2/g). All other included materials showed only small sizes of the specific surface area (Ceros80 1.8 m2/g, Ceros82 1.31 m2/g, Cerasorb 1.2 m2/g, Biobase 0.7 m2/g, Endobone 0.7 m2/g, Perioglas 0.6 m2/g, Allotropat50 0.23 m2/g, Biogran 0.2 m2/g). The materials with large and medium sizes of the specific surface area evaluated the following pore diameters: BioOss 2-50 nm, Algipore new 2-100 nm, Algipore old 5-50 nm, Interpore200 2-100 nm. Pore sizes less than 2 nm were not found in relevant numbers. The materials BioOss, old and new Algipore, and Interpore200 contain a large interconnecting mesopore system (diameter < 1 micron). For the materials Biobase, Endobone, Perioglas, Allotropat 50, and Biogran this cannot be assumed. The materials Ceros80, Ceros82, and Cerasorb evaluated a specific surface area between those and might include only a small part of these interconnecting pores. An influence of the interconnecting porosity and the different sizes of the specific surface areas on the biological behavior of the bone regeneration materials can be suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10900957     DOI: 10.1007/s100060050187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  4 in total

1.  Bio-inspired porous SiC ceramics loaded with vancomycin for preventing MRSA infections.

Authors:  P Díaz-Rodríguez; M Landin; A Rey-Rico; J Couceiro; T Coenye; P González; J Serra; M López-Álvarez; B León
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Comparative study of bone repair using porous hydroxyapatite/ β-tricalcium phosphate and xenograft scaffold in rabbits with tibia defect.

Authors:  Zohreh Bagher; Farzad Rajaei; Mohammadali Shokrgozar
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2012

3.  Dental Stem Cell Migration on Pulp Ceiling Cavities Filled with MTA, Dentin Chips, or Bio-Oss.

Authors:  Stefania Lymperi; Vasiliki Taraslia; Ioannis N Tsatsoulis; Athina Samara; Athanasios D Velentzas; Anastasia Agrafioti; Ema Anastasiadou; Evangelos Kontakiotis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  In vitro proliferation of human osteogenic cells in presence of different commercial bone substitute materials combined with enamel matrix derivatives.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; Bilal Al-Nawas; Ralf Smeets; Adrian Kasaj; Werner Götz; Marcus O Klein
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.151

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.