Literature DB >> 10899650

The role of cathepsin D and PAI-1 in primary invasive breast cancer as prognosticators and predictors of treatment benefit with adjuvant tamoxifen.

A M Billgren1, L E Rutqvist, H Johansson, T Hägerström, L Skoog.   

Abstract

In the last few years there has been an increased interest in treatment predictive factors in breast cancer patients. The aim of the study was to analyse the role of cathepsin D and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression as independent prognosticators and to assess their predictive value with respect to tamoxifen treatment. This study comprises 1851 patients with primary breast cancer diagnosed during 1988-1992. Their median age was 62 years (range: 24-91). The end-point was distant disease recurrence-free interval. Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen was given to 1136 patients (61%). The median follow-up time was 59 months (range: 39-88). Cathepsin D content was shown to be a significant independent prognosticator in multivariate Cox analysis (P=0.02). The optimal cut-off level was 10 fmol/mg protein, other cut-off levels did not improve the results. The level of cathepsin D also appeared to predict the benefit of tamoxifen among oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients although this result did not reach statistical significance (P=0.09). In a multivariate Cox analysis including 497 patients PAI-1 content was shown to be a significant independent prognosticator (P=0.003) but did not appear to predict the benefit of tamoxifen treatment. The optimal cut-off level appeared to be 3 ng/mg protein, which was close to the median value 2.5 ng/mg (range: 0-51). We conclude that cathepsin D is a significant independent prognosticator and may possibly also predict the benefit of tamoxifen amongst ER-positive patients. PAI-1 was also found to be a strong independent prognosticator but no treatment interaction with adjuvant tamoxifen was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899650     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00114-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  Cathepsin D-related disease-free interval in pT1 primary breast carcinomas: a pilot study.

Authors:  D Nikolić-Vukosavljević; M Markićević; G Grujić-Adanja; A Petrović; K Kanjer; Z Nesković-Konstantinović
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Procathepsin D and cancer: From molecular biology to clinical applications.

Authors:  Vaclav Vetvicka; Aruna Vashishta; Sujata Saraswat-Ohri; Jana Vetvickova
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 3.  A Phenomic Perspective on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Treatment: Integrating Aging and Lifestyle in Blood and Tissue Biomarker Profiling.

Authors:  Ainhoa Arana Echarri; Mark Beresford; John P Campbell; Robert H Jones; Rachel Butler; Kenneth J Gollob; Patricia C Brum; Dylan Thompson; James E Turner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Cathepsin D--many functions of one aspartic protease.

Authors:  Petr Benes; Vaclav Vetvicka; Martin Fusek
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  New insights into procathepsin D in pathological and physiological conditions.

Authors:  Sujata Saraswat-Ohri; Vaclav Vetvicka
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-05

6.  Lymph node status as a guide to selection of available prognostic markers in breast cancer: the clinical practice of the future?

Authors:  A Elzagheid; T Kuopio; S Pyrhönen; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Elevated expression of polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase in breast cancer tissue is associated with tamoxifen failure in patients with advanced disease.

Authors:  J A Foekens; Ch Ries; M P Look; C Gippner-Steppert; J G M Klijn; M Jochum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  uPA and PAI-1 as biomarkers in breast cancer: validated for clinical use in level-of-evidence-1 studies.

Authors:  Michael J Duffy; Patricia M McGowan; Nadia Harbeck; Christoph Thomssen; Manfred Schmitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Prognostic role of high cathepsin D expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junho Kang; Yeuni Yu; Seongdo Jeong; Hansong Lee; Hye Jin Heo; Jeong Jun Park; Hee Sam Na; Dai Sik Ko; Yun Hak Kim
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 8.168

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.