Literature DB >> 10899384

Modulation of morphine-induced antinociception by palatable solutions in male and female rats.

R B Kanarek1, B Homoleski.   

Abstract

The analgesic potency of opioid drugs varies as a function of gender, and can be modified by the intake of palatable sweet-tasting solutions. To determine if gender interacts with diet-induced changes in antinociceptive responses, male and female Long-Evans rats were fed laboratory chow and water alone, or chow, water and either a 32% w/v sucrose solution or a 0.15% w/v saccharin solution, and tested in two analgesic paradigms, the tail-flick test and the hot-plate test. For both tests, antinociceptive responses of male and female rats were tested following administration of cumulative doses (1.25, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg, SC) of morphine sulfate. On the tail-flick test, morphine produced dose-related increases in antinociceptive responses. In addition, relative to both the chow only and saccharin conditions, chronic intake of the sucrose solution access significantly augmented morphine's antinociceptive properties. On the hot-plate test, when the plate was heated to 51 degrees C, morphine led to significant dose-related increases in antinociceptive responses, but diet did not affected antinociceptive responses. When the temperature of the hot plate was increased to 53 degrees C, there was a trend for animals given sucrose to have greater antinociceptive responses than those given either chow alone or saccharin. No differences in baseline pain sensitivity or morphine-induced analgesia were observed as a function of gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899384     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  6 in total

1.  Antinociceptive actions of peripheral glucose administration.

Authors:  Rinah T Yamamoto; Wendy Foulds-Mathes; Robin B Kanarek
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 2.  The relationship between opioid and sugar intake: review of evidence and clinical applications.

Authors:  David J Mysels; Maria A Sullivan
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  You are what you eat: influence of type and amount of food consumed on central dopamine systems and the behavioral effects of direct- and indirect-acting dopamine receptor agonists.

Authors:  Michelle G Baladi; Lynette C Daws; Charles P France
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Eating is a protected behavior even in the face of persistent pain in male rats.

Authors:  H Foo; Katherine Crabtree; Ama Thrasher; Peggy Mason
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-24

5.  Sex and Estrous Cycle Differences in Analgesia and Brain Oxycodone Levels.

Authors:  Nicole Arguelles; Sharon Miksys; Rachel F Tyndale
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 6.  Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies.

Authors:  P J Rogers; P S Hogenkamp; C de Graaf; S Higgs; A Lluch; A R Ness; C Penfold; R Perry; P Putz; M R Yeomans; D J Mela
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.095

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.