Literature DB >> 10899195

Long-latency component of the stretch reflex in human muscle is not mediated by intramuscular stretch receptors.

D M Corden1, O C Lippold, K Buchanan, C Norrington.   

Abstract

Reflex responses to mechanical stimulation of muscle (brief imposed movement) were investigated. Reflexes were elicited in the forefinger, recording from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and in the foot, recording from soleus. These responses typically consisted of a short-latency component (M1) and a long-latency component (M2) at 33 ms and 53 ms, respectively, after the stimulus in the case of FDI, and 37 ms and 68 ms, respectively, in soleus upon stimulation of the sole of the foot. Normally, when a muscle is stretched by a mechanical stimulus (either naturally or by an experimentally imposed movement), both skin receptors and muscle stretch receptors are activated. It is possible, however, to devise stimulation parameters where this is not the case. Fixating the finger with plasticine enables the effects of skin stimulation to be studied without stretching the FDI muscle. On the other hand, tapping a long tendon allows muscle stretch receptors to be activated without involving skin or subcutaneous structures. Component M1 was always abolished by finger fixation in 40 trials on 10 subjects, with M2 being essentially unchanged in latency, duration, or amplitude. Reflex responses were obtained in soleus muscle in nine experiments by prodding the sole of the foot (thereby stimulating both skin and muscle stretch receptors). Alternatively, the tendo achilles was prodded (which solely activates stretch receptors in the muscle). In the former, M1 and M2 were generated. In the latter, only M1 was produced. It is concluded that the long-latency component of the stretch reflex, M2, originates in skin and/or subcutaneous nerve terminals and that no part of M2 originates in muscle stretch receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899195     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Adaptive changes in locomotor control after partial denervation of triceps surae muscles in the cat.

Authors:  V Gritsenko; V Mushahwar; A Prochazka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Excitability changes in human forearm corticospinal projections and spinal reflex pathways during rhythmic voluntary movement of the opposite limb.

Authors:  R G Carson; S Riek; D C Mackey; D P Meichenbaum; K Willms; M Forner; W D Byblow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Medium-latency reflex response elicited from the flexor carpi radialis by radial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Hilmi Uysal; Ferah Kızılay; Sirin Erkaya Inel; Hakan Özen; Gökhan Pek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The monosynaptic Ia afferent pathway can largely explain the stretch duration effect of the long latency M2 response.

Authors:  Jasper Schuurmans; Erwin de Vlugt; Alfred C Schouten; Carel G M Meskers; Jurriaan H de Groot; Frans C T van der Helm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Upper limb static-stretching protocol decreases maximal concentric jump performance.

Authors:  Paulo H Marchetti; Fernando H D de Oliveira Silva; Enrico G Soares; Erica P Serpa; Priscyla S M Nardi; Guanis de B Vilela; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in the Long-Latency Stretch Reflex Following Paired Stimulation from a Wearable Electronic Device.

Authors:  K M Riashad Foysal; Felipe de Carvalho; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cells in the monkey ponto-medullary reticular formation modulate their activity with slow finger movements.

Authors:  Demetris S Soteropoulos; Elizabeth R Williams; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Investigating the role of vibrotactile noise in early response to perturbation.

Authors:  Pilwon Hur; Yao-Hung Wan; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.