Literature DB >> 10898854

Electrostatic factors in DNA intercalation.

C Medhi1, J B Mitchell, S L Price, A B Tabor.   

Abstract

The factors that determine the binding of a chromophore between the base pairs in DNA intercalation complexes are dissected. The electrostatic potential in the intercalation plane is calculated using an accurate ab initio based distributed multipole electrostatic model for a range of intercalation sites, involving different sequences of base pairs and relative twist angles. There will be a significant electrostatic contribution to the binding energy for chromophores with a predominantly positive electrostatic potential, but this varies significantly with sequence, and somewhat with twist angle. The usefulness of these potential maps for understanding the binding of intercalators is explored by calculating the electrostatic binding energy for 9-aminoacridine, ethidium, and daunomycin in a variety of model binding sites. The electrostatic forces play a major role in the positioning of an intercalating 9-aminoacridine and a significant stabilizing role in the binding of ethidium in its sterically constrained position, but the intercalation of daunomycin is determined by the side-chain binding. Sequence preferences are likely to be determined by a complex and subtle mixture of effects, with electrostatics being just one component. The electrostatic binding energy is also unlikely to be a major determinant of the twist angle, as its variation with angle is modest for most intercalation sites. Overall, the electrostatic potential maps give guidance on how positively charged chromophores can be chemically adapted by heteroatomic substitution to optimise their binding. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10898854     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0282(1999)52:2<84::AID-BIP2>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  5 in total

1.  Hydropathic analysis of the free energy differences in anthracycline antibiotic binding to DNA.

Authors:  Derek J Cashman; J Neel Scarsdale; Glen E Kellogg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Bioactive principles in the bark of Pilidiostigma tropicum.

Authors:  William N Setzer; Glenn F Rozmus; Mary C Setzer; Jennifer M Schmidt; Bernhard Vogler; Sabine Reeb; Betsy R Jackes; Anthony K Irvine
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Sequence specificity in DNA-drug intercalation: MD simulation and density functional theory approaches.

Authors:  Lakshmi Maganti; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Through-Space Effects of Substituents Dominate Molecular Electrostatic Potentials of Substituted Arenes.

Authors:  Steven E Wheeler; K N Houk
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Recent developments in the chemistry of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) intercalators: principles, design, synthesis, applications and trends.

Authors:  Brenno A D Neto; Alexandre A M Lapis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.