Literature DB >> 10898677

Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in rabbits.

T J Walsh1, A J Jackson, J W Lee, M Amantea, T Sein, J Bacher, L Zech.   

Abstract

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of patients with invasive fungal infections who are intolerant of or refractory to conventional amphotericin B therapy. Little is known, however, about the pharmacokinetics of this new antifungal compound. We therefore investigated the pharmacokinetics of ABLC in comparison with those of conventional desoxycholate amphotericin B (DAmB) in rabbits. The pharmacokinetics of DAmB in a rabbit model were similar to those previously reported in humans. The pharmacokinetics of ABLC differed substantially from those of DAmB. Plasma amphotericin B levels following ABLC administration were 10 times lower than those following administration of an equal dosage of DAmB. The levels of ABLC in whole blood were approximately 40 times greater than those in plasma. The ABLC model differed from the DAmB model by (i) a dose- and time-dependent uptake and return between the plasma compartment and apparent cellular components of the blood-sediment compartment and (ii) time-dependent tissue uptake and return to plasma from serially connected compartments. Following infusion of ABLC, there was a nonlinear uptake into the apparent cellular components of the blood-sediment compartment. This uptake was related to the reciprocal of the integral of the total amount of drug infused (i.e., the more drug infused the greater the fractional uptake between 0.5 and 5 mg/kg of body weight for ABLC). The transfer of drug from plasma to the cellular components of the blood-sediment compartment resulted in initial uptake followed by rapid redistribution back to the plasma. The study describes a detailed model of the pharmacokinetics of ABLC and characterizes a potential role of the cellular components of the blood-sediment compartment in the distribution of this new antifungal compound in tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10898677      PMCID: PMC90015          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2068-2076.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  15 in total

1.  Amphotericin B in the treatment of Candida cholecystitis.

Authors:  P C Adamson; M G Rinaldi; P A Pizzo; T J Walsh
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 2.  Recent progress and current problems in treatment of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  T J Walsh; J W Hiemenz; E Anaissie
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.982

Review 3.  Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: recent progress and future directions.

Authors:  J W Hiemenz; T J Walsh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  A population pharmacokinetic model for docetaxel (Taxotere): model building and validation.

Authors:  R Bruno; N Vivier; J C Vergniol; S L De Phillips; G Montay; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-04

5.  Behavior of amphotericin B lipid complex in plasma in vitro and in the circulation of rats.

Authors:  R Bhamra; A Sa'ad; L E Bolcsak; A S Janoff; C E Swenson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Liposomal and lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B.

Authors:  S de Marie
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: classification, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  S E Vartivarian; E J Anaissie; G P Bodey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Unusual lipid structures selectively reduce the toxicity of amphotericin B.

Authors:  A S Janoff; L T Boni; M C Popescu; S R Minchey; P R Cullis; T D Madden; T Taraschi; S M Gruner; E Shyamsunder; M W Tate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Liposomal and lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  R Janknegt; S de Marie; I A Bakker-Woudenberg; D J Crommelin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Sensitive high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay for amphotericin B which incorporates an internal standard.

Authors:  G G Granich; G S Kobayashi; D J Krogstad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal agents: in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and prospects for combination therapy.

Authors:  A H Groll; H Kolve
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison of amphotericin B (AMB) and two lipid-associated AMB preparations, liposomal AMB and AMB lipid complex, in murine candidiasis models.

Authors:  D Andes; N Safdar; K Marchillo; R Conklin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in neonates.

Authors:  Gudrun Würthwein; Andreas H Groll; Georg Hempel; Felice C Adler-Shohet; Jay M Lieberman; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Dosage-dependent antifungal efficacy of V-echinocandin (LY303366) against experimental fluconazole-resistant oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis.

Authors:  V Petraitis; R Petraitiene; A H Groll; T Sein; R L Schaufele; C A Lyman; A Francesconi; J Bacher; S C Piscitelli; T J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Compartmentalized intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B and its lipid formulations.

Authors:  Andreas H Groll; Caron A Lyman; Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Derek Armstrong; Diana Mickiene; Raul M Alfaro; Robert L Schaufele; Tin Sein; John Bacher; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in patients infected with Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi: maximum tolerated dose study.

Authors:  T J Walsh; J L Goodman; P Pappas; I Bekersky; D N Buell; M Roden; J Barrett; E J Anaissie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of APOMINE: a meta-analysis in cancer patients and healthy males.

Authors:  Peter L Bonate; Simon Floret; Craig Bentzen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Comparative efficacies of four amphotericin B formulations--Fungizone, amphotec (Amphocil), AmBisome, and Abelcet--against systemic murine aspergillosis.

Authors:  Karl V Clemons; David A Stevens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Amphotericin B-gum arabic conjugates: synthesis, toxicity, bioavailability, and activities against Leishmania and fungi.

Authors:  K K Nishi; M Antony; P V Mohanan; T V Anilkumar; P M Loiseau; A Jayakrishnan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.580

10.  Weekly high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in critically ill septic patients with multiple Candida colonization: The AmBiDex study.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Jean-François Timsit; Alexandre Lautrette; Stephane Legriel; Adeline Max; Stephane Ruckly; Benoit Misset; Yves Cohen; Michel Wolff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.