Literature DB >> 10898560

Preconsultation education promoting breast cancer screening: does the choice of media make a difference?

R L Street1, A Van Order, R Bramson, T Manning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multimedia technology can be a valuable resource for health promotion and patient education initiatives because it allows messages to be presented within an environment that is both sensory-rich and interactive (i.e., the user can explore the information according to his or her particular needs and interests). Using clinic waiting time as an opportunity for breast cancer education, this investigation examined whether an educational intervention promoting breast cancer screening would be more effective when using interactive multimedia than when using written materials.
METHODS: Over a five-month period, 108 women (40-70 years of age) from two clinics (a family practice clinic and a free clinic for the poor) participated in the study. Participants initially completed measures assessing perceptions of the personal importance of breast cancer, knowledge, and anxiety about screening procedures. They then were randomly assigned to receive breast cancer education by using an interactive multimedia program or by reading a brochure. Following the intervention, the participants once again completed the perceived importance, knowledge, and anxiety measures, and evaluated the educational materials.
RESULTS: These women perceived breast cancer to be a more personally important health issue, learned more, and reported less anxiety about cancer screening following the intervention regardless of method. Younger women learned more from the educational materials than did older women. Although the multimedia program received more favorable evaluations than the brochure, this effect was mediated by the message recipient's age, as younger women responded more favorably to the multimedia materials than did older women.
CONCLUSION: Preconsultation education is a valuable but rarely used opportunity to promote breast cancer screening. If well constructed, educational materials using a variety of media can be effective. While preferences for media may in part depend on the audience's age, considerably more research is needed to better understand how the interplay of media, message, and audience characteristics can help accomplish health-promotion objectives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10898560     DOI: 10.1080/08858199809528537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  5 in total

Review 1.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

2.  From surviving to thriving: a health and wellness colloquium for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Mark Stoutenberg; Stacy Cutrono; Arlette C Perry
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Gurpreet K Rana; Sarah Hawley; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Karen Kelly-Blake; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

5.  Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention.

Authors:  Inge Renske van Bruinessen; Evelyn M van Weel-Baumgarten; Harm Wouter Snippe; Hans Gouw; Josée M Zijlstra; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.