Literature DB >> 10898336

The role of positron emission tomography in the management of bone metastases.

G J Cook1, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear medicine technique that only recently has been widely used in clinical oncology. PET, as a metabolic imaging technique, demonstrates advantages over and complements structural imaging methods and also demonstrates differences from conventional nuclear medicine, all of which has led to its enormous growth in clinical applications in recent years.
METHODS: There is now a large body of literature on the use of PET with various tracers, especially (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG), in large numbers of patients with carcinoma. In the assessment of the skeleton in patients with carcinoma, early reports of PET imaging are now available with the use of (18)F-fluoride as a bone agent and the use of (18)FDG as a tumor agent, and the current knowledge is summarized in this report.
RESULTS: High-quality tomographic PET bone scans are possible with (18)F-fluoride with possible advantages in sensitivity and specificity over conventional bone scintigraphy. With (18)FDG, it is possible to image tumor metabolism directly, and early studies have demonstrated a high sensitivity for the detection of skeletal metastases, although the demonstration of osteoblastic metastases may be less satisfactory.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical role of PET in the evaluation of patients with bone metastases is not yet defined; however, as described in this report, there is emerging evidence that this imaging method also may aid patient management in this area with the use of either (18)FDG or (18)F-fluoride ion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10898336     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<2927::aid-cncr8>3.3.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Indeterminate lesions on planar bone scintigraphy in lung cancer patients: SPECT, CT or SPECT-CT?

Authors:  Punit Sharma; Rakesh Kumar; Harmandeep Singh; Chandrasekhar Bal; Pramod Kumar Julka; Sanjay Thulkar; Arun Malhotra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Detection of vertebral metastases: a meta-analysis comparing MRI, CT, PET, BS and BS with SPECT.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Shenghao Wang; Hao Liu; Bin Meng; Feng Zhou; Fan He; Xiaojian Shi; Huilin Yang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Differentiation of metastatic vs degenerative joint disease using semi-quantitative analysis with (18)F-NaF PET/CT in castrate resistant prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Saima Muzahir; Robert Jeraj; Glenn Liu; Lance T Hall; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Timothy Perk; Christine Jaskowiak; Scott B Perlman
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 5.  Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Shen; Houfu Deng; Shuang Hu; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  PET and PET/CT using 18F-FDG in the diagnosis and management of cancer patients.

Authors:  Keigo Endo; Noboru Oriuchi; Tetsuya Higuchi; Yasuhiko Iida; Hirofumi Hanaoka; Mitsuyuki Miyakubo; Tomohiro Ishikita; Keiko Koyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A prospective study of bone tumor response assessment in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Colleen M Costelloe; Tsuyoshi Hamaoka; Caimiao Wei; Naoki Niikura; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John E Madewell; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Impact of [18F]FDG-PET on the primary staging of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  I Brink; T Schumacher; M Mix; S Ruhland; E Stoelben; W Digel; M Henke; N Ghanem; E Moser; E U Nitzsche
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Flare response versus disease progression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Khalsa Al-Nabhani; Rizwan Syed; Athar Haroon; Omar Almukhailed; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-01

10.  Tumour response interpretation with new tumour response criteria vs the World Health Organisation criteria in patients with bone-only metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  T Hamaoka; C M Costelloe; J E Madewell; P Liu; D A Berry; R Islam; R L Theriault; G N Hortobagyi; N T Ueno
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.