| Literature DB >> 10897397 |
T Kubo1, T Sakashita, M Kusuki, K Kyunai, K Ueno, C Hikawa, T Wada, Y Nakai.
Abstract
The accuracy of radiological examinations has improved and their diagnostic ability has markedly increased. However, the cost of such examinations has also recently become an issue. In this study, the clinical significance of radiological examinations for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was evaluated and the value of their utilization was reconsidered. A total of 1,276 ears of 724 patients who demonstrated unilateral or bilateral SNHL was studied retrospectively. Findings of radiological examinations such as plain X-ray (X-p), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain or the temporal bone were investigated. Temporal bone X-p was usually performed to rule out acoustic tumors (AT). CT was further performed in 119 patients (16.4%) and MRI in 84 patients (11.6%) in total. The reasons or symptoms for further examination such as CT or MRI were X-p findings or auditory symptoms suspicious for AT or vertigo/dizziness suspicious for intracranial disease. Of five causes with AT, two with a small tumor exhibited normal findings for the internal auditory canal on temporal bone X-p. These small ATs were finally confirmed by MRI. MRI could also detect lacunar infarctions, cerebral atrophy and high jugular bulb which might be related to SNHL. These findings confirmed that MRI is very useful for detecting small ATs and suggested that MRI also reveals cerebral vascular insufficiency in patients with SNHL.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10897397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Suppl ISSN: 0365-5237