S A Nicholson1, M R Ryan. 1. Lauren V Ackerman Laboratory of Surgical Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nosology of neuroendocrine neoplasia has evolved substantially in recent years. The aim of this study was to review the authors' institutional experience and diagnostic accuracy for cytologic specimens of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and to identify features most suggestive of neuroendocrine differentiation. METHODS: The cytologic and histologic findings of 29 archival NEC in which cytology preceded biopsy or resection were compared. The study was comprised of 6 carcinoid tumors, 3 atypical carcinoid tumors, 17 high grade NEC (5 small cell, 9 large cell, and 3 mixed small/large cell), and 3 combined NEC/nonneuroendocrine carcinomas. Cytologic material was derived from 21 fine-needle aspirates (FNA), 6 bronchial brushing/washings, and 2 gastrointestinal tract brushings. RESULTS: Of the 29 cases, the correct cytologic diagnosis was rendered in 11. Two cases were identified as NEC but were graded incorrectly. The remaining 16 cases were interpreted as nonsmall cell carcinoma (8 cases); diagnostic or suspicious of carcinoma, not otherwise specified (7 cases); and atypical, indeterminate for malignancy (1 case). On review, neuroendocrine features were identified in 14 of the latter 16 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The cytologic diagnosis of NEC, both high and low grade, can be difficult. Because of acinus-like formations and columnar cell shapes, low grade NEC may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma. Small cell carcinomas, especially in bronchial brush and wash preparations, may be difficult to classify beyond malignant. Large cell NEC may be confused with nonneuroendocrine carcinomas because of abundant cytoplasm and nucleoli. Attention to the presence of loose cell aggregates in a background of singly dispersed cells; feathery patterns created by tumor cells clinging to capillaries; rosette formations; delicate, granular cytoplasm; inconspicuous nucleoli; molding in high grade tumors; and, most important, speckled or dusty chromatin patterns are useful in identifying neuroendocrine differentiation in cytologic specimens.
BACKGROUND: The nosology of neuroendocrine neoplasia has evolved substantially in recent years. The aim of this study was to review the authors' institutional experience and diagnostic accuracy for cytologic specimens of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and to identify features most suggestive of neuroendocrine differentiation. METHODS: The cytologic and histologic findings of 29 archival NEC in which cytology preceded biopsy or resection were compared. The study was comprised of 6 carcinoid tumors, 3 atypical carcinoid tumors, 17 high grade NEC (5 small cell, 9 large cell, and 3 mixed small/large cell), and 3 combined NEC/nonneuroendocrine carcinomas. Cytologic material was derived from 21 fine-needle aspirates (FNA), 6 bronchial brushing/washings, and 2 gastrointestinal tract brushings. RESULTS: Of the 29 cases, the correct cytologic diagnosis was rendered in 11. Two cases were identified as NEC but were graded incorrectly. The remaining 16 cases were interpreted as nonsmall cell carcinoma (8 cases); diagnostic or suspicious of carcinoma, not otherwise specified (7 cases); and atypical, indeterminate for malignancy (1 case). On review, neuroendocrine features were identified in 14 of the latter 16 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The cytologic diagnosis of NEC, both high and low grade, can be difficult. Because of acinus-like formations and columnar cell shapes, low grade NEC may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma. Small cell carcinomas, especially in bronchial brush and wash preparations, may be difficult to classify beyond malignant. Large cell NEC may be confused with nonneuroendocrine carcinomas because of abundant cytoplasm and nucleoli. Attention to the presence of loose cell aggregates in a background of singly dispersed cells; feathery patterns created by tumor cells clinging to capillaries; rosette formations; delicate, granular cytoplasm; inconspicuous nucleoli; molding in high grade tumors; and, most important, speckled or dusty chromatin patterns are useful in identifying neuroendocrine differentiation in cytologic specimens.
Authors: Andrea Frilling; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Jun Li; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Ursula Plöckinger Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: P Correale; A Sciandivasci; C Intrivici; A Pascucci; M T Del Vecchio; S Marsili; V Savelli; L Voltolini; M Di Bisceglie; A Guarnieri; G Gotti; G Francini Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jordan P Reynolds; Jesse S Voss; Shannon M Brankley; Jill M Caudill; Michael R Henry; Amy C Clayton; Kevin C Halling; Aziza Nassar Journal: Cytojournal Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 2.091