Literature DB >> 10895447

Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography.

M S To1, C Skentou, S Cicero, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnancy and examine the factors that may influence these measurements.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 149 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine ultrasound examination at 23 weeks of gestation. In all women the cervix was successfully visualized by transvaginal sonography and cervical length was measured after emptying of the bladder. This measurement was compared to that obtained by transabdominal sonography. In addition the ability to visualize the cervix transabdominally was examined in relation to body mass index (BMI), bladder volume and cervical length.
RESULTS: The percentage of cases in which the cervix could be seen transabdominally increased from 42% for bladder volume of < 50 ml to 73% for volumes > 150 ml, and 13% for cervical length < 20 mm to 51% for lengths > 40 mm. The ability to visualize the cervix was unrelated to BMI. Although there was a significant association between measurements taken transabdominally with those made transvaginally, measurements taken with a full bladder were significantly longer than those with an empty bladder.
CONCLUSION: The aim of cervical assessment in pregnancy is to identify women with a short cervix because they are at high risk of preterm delivery. This aim can not be fulfilled by transabdominal sonography. Such a scan fails to visualize the cervix in a high proportion of cases and in particular those with a short cervix. Furthermore, successful visualization requires a full bladder which falsely increases cervical length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10895447     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  7 in total

1.  Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Roberto Romero; Hyunyoung Ahn; Youssef Hussein; Lami Yeo; Steven J Korzeniewski; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-03-16

2.  Consistency in the transabdominal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in mid-pregnancy.

Authors:  Michelle K Pedretti; Elizabeth A Nathan; Dorota A Doherty; Jan E Dickinson
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 3.  A blueprint for the prevention of preterm birth: vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Lami Yeo; Jezid Miranda; Sonia S Hassan; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  Is transabdominal ultrasound scanning of cervical measurement in mid-trimester pregnancy a useful alternative to transvaginal ultrasound scan?

Authors:  Kalyansree Chaudhury; Mrinalkanti Ghosh; Atin Halder; Sourav Senapati; Sudeshna Chaudhury
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-12-01

5.  Cervical length measurement: Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway; Lars Henning Pedersen; Jon Hyett
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  Cervical length measurement in nulliparous women at term by ultrasound & its relationship to spontaneous onset of labour.

Authors:  Joydev Mukherji; Avishek Bhadra; Suhas Kumar Ghosh; Avijit Hazra; Monika Anant; Subir Kumar Bhattacharya; Bibekananda Das; Shabnam Banu
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Yong Zhang; Shuangshuang Chen; Xiaowei Xiang; Juan Wen; Mei Yi; Baiyun He; Bing Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.